The most discouraging test for Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal



[ad_1]

Last month, while the white line of England increased the possibilities of cricket 50-overs while whitening Australia, Sachin Tendulkar launched a debate on the use of new bullets on both sides in this format, the caller A Recipe for Disaster

Virat Kohli was in agreement with Tendulkar, calling two new bullets "brutal" for the bowlers, but he felt that it was a good thing. a kind of bowler, a kind India had two, could still threaten the drummers, even in "There is practically no room to attack cricket from the bowler's point of view if you do not provide him with throws that help him with the new ball, "Kohli said. "I played ODI cricket when there was only one new ball allowed and the reverse swing was a big factor in the last half of the innings, which I thought was more difficult as a drummer.

"Nowadays, honestly I think it's very very difficult for bowlers with two new balls and the pitch is flat and they literally have no way of s & d. Come out, unless you have wrists in your side, who can do the job in the middle. Not all members have this cushion, so they find it difficult. We probably have wrists, that's why we did not feel this factor, but I'm sure it's very difficult for bowlers who can not buy the wicket when the balls are beautiful and hard. "

Kohli made this statement Intense or not, his words contained a challenge, both for English drummers as for his own daggers, Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav, on the eve of a short series of L & # 39; the year before a World Cup in the same conditions.

This competition was therefore to be decisive in the biggest competition: between two young wrist-wrists and a batting order full of talent from end to end. [19659002] The T20I came out on top, and in the course of three matches, this mini-contest has calmed down from a boil (five at Kuldeep to Old Trafford) to a slow simmer (Kuldeep did not feature at all) in Bristol) while India won 2-1.

What will Bearin? g these events have on ODIs is not clear.Egypt is a much better team of more than 100 overtaking than more than 40. Since the end of the World Cup 2015, they have the best their world score of 46-19 in ODI against 15-14 in the T20I. [19659002Thisperiodofthecrackerperformedfrom5903andcontrolled633runnedintermediatebraceletswithinMODIAnequipmentswhichisexpectedfromtheseCommandsandthereinbestindependent

Chart: England is one of the best ODI players since 2015, but the quality of India is going to trouble them ? Datawrapper / ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Each of the leading drummers of England at this time has a strong record against the wrist, with the low averages of Ben Stokes and Moeen Ali may be a function of the same. enter the warrant to strike a ball

At home, at the same time, England's record against the wrist is even more frightening: a score of 6.95 and an average of 232,333 with only three layoffs in 16 innings.

Chahal and Kuldeep still face such a discouraging review. So far, their biggest ODI challenges have come home, against Australia and New Zealand, and their major streak, where they have taken 33 wickets together in six matches, coincided with a series of wounds that left a number of key drummers at various points. Despite everything, they passed all the tests and solved problems that had limited India as an ODI bowling team.

India began to stick together after the Champions Trophy last year in England. the lands where their inability to take wickets in intermediary circles strongly contributed to their two defeats – in Sri Lanka in the group stage and in Pakistan in the final. They immediately began to change the composition of their attack, gradually removing the pin of R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja, and introducing Kuldeep and Chahal during their next two ODI series.

trend. In 2015, the fingerpinners played about 3.4 balls with each wrist-delivered ball in ODI cricket. This ratio has been steadily declining, year after year, and the figure for 2018, 2.0, is expected to drop further over the next week, when Englishman Adil Rashid will be alongside Chahal and Kuldeep.

More and more willing to make cant in the last few years ESPNcricinfo Ltd

The passage of India from fingerpin to wristspin has been a huge success. Since the end of the Champions Trophy, they have won 21 of their 26 completed ODIs and won six successive series victories.

At that time, their bowlers took 116 wickets (not counting points) 11 -40 in 26 innings, averaging 29.93. None of the major ODI teams has a better average average over this period, and only Pakistan has a better economy average than India at 4.83.

Between the end of the 2015 World Cup and the end of the 2017 Champions Trophy, India had been much less effective in the semifinals, averaging 37.90 and conceding 5.09 points per game. match.

The comparison of the six major specialty spinners used by India since the end of the 2015 World Cup is also instructive. The three wrist players – both current and Amit Mishra – have nearly identical middle averages, all between 22 and 23, with Ashwin (42.64), Jadeja (61.66) and Axar Patel (36.47) behind them . Axar has done a job, conceding only 4.24 points per game, but Ashwin and Jadeja have economic rates north of five.

Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal had a big impact on the intermediate keels of India ESPNcricinfo Ltd

The fact that wrist wrists were both economical and incisive could have been come as a bonus for India. They were introduced mainly with strike rates in mind, with the hope that they could take wickets even in high scoring games on flat land. Ashwin and Jadeja were not able to do it in the Champions Trophy, and India wanted bowlers who could, under similar conditions in 2019.

Two recent games stand out for daggers that do this kind of impact. arrived in September 2017, in Indore, where Australia, 2-0 in the five-game series, was 224 for 1 in the 38th, Aaron Finch beat 124 and Steven Smith 51. L & # Australia appeared ready for 330, but they collapsed to 243 for 4, Kuldeep and Chahal picking up three quick wickets, and finally only 293, which India chased with ease.

Although Kuldeep cashed 55 of his first seven overs, Kohli stays with him, believing that he was more likely than part-time employees to make an impact on a road to a pitch, and was awarded with two wickets that defeated most of Australia 's momentum. It was a similar match at ODI Dunedin last March, when Ish Sodhi caused a collapse of England from 267 to 1 at 313 for 9. New Zealand continued 336 courtesy of Ross Taylor, an ODI player of all time.

The other example of the value of India's wrist-bracelets on flat lands came in Kanpur, in October 2017, in the decisive of a three-game series against the New Zealand. India finally won by six points. Here, New Zealand continued 338 and was serenely placed at 153 for 1 in 25th place, with Colin Munro and Kane Williamson compiling a century stand for the second wicket. Chahal dismissed both with flight and cunning, and in one way or another only 47 races in his 10 overs on a field that produced 668 out of 100.

These are the qualities that India loves the most in their wrists. Chahal has a real sense for the intentions of a drummer, honed over the years of bowling on the flat IPL platforms at Chinnaswamy Stadium, and knows exactly when to pull him flat in the middle and at the leg and when the hang slower and wider. Kuldeep will continue to ride the ball and vary his pace even when he's gone for a few, trusting his own skills to override those of the best drummers.

The ODI against England will test all these qualities. to present itself as a bowling unit one year after the 2019 World Cup.

[ad_2]
Source link