Drops trial with John Arne Riise



[ad_1]

In April, the former player of the national football team John Arne Riise was sentenced to repay $ 483,000, his account was fired.

It is in the fall of 2016 that it was learned that one person had filed a lawsuit against Riise. After losing in court, he refused to give up, the verdict was appealed and Star Prosecutor John Christian Elden was hired to direct the appeal proceedings.






Attorney Mette Yvonne Larsen.

Attorney Mette Yvonne Larsen.

NTB scanpix

It was originally scheduled for Dec. 3 at the Frostating Court of Appeal, but this will never be of importance.

– John Arne Riise has fully agreed to repay the money. It will be his lawyer, John Christian Elden. An agreement between the parties has been signed and there is no more litigation, says the lawyer of the person, Mette Yvonne Larsen, to Nettavisen.

"My client is unable to continue the fight against Riise and is now ready to pay the full EUR 483,000, which we think is a good solution.

The reason for the conflict is that Riise lost ten withdrawals between 07/12/16 and 19/03/17. The total amount was 483,000 crowns. The money belonged to a third party.

The largest withdrawal was $ 150,000, and Riise never denied taking money out of this account, but objected to the request when it was sued.

– The money is left in a blocked account and both parties go from their account to a shared account, writes Elden in an email to Nettavisen.

Riise's counterpart released 51,600 crowns from the same account when it was discovered that it was missing 483,000. Earlier, Larsen told Nettavisen that she was asking her client to take the remaining amount. to prevent this money from being lost.


John Christian Elden

John Christian Elden

Paul Weaver

In the District Court, Riise requested that this amount be paid, but the court flagrantly rejected it.

In the District Court, Riise was also ordered to pay the counterparty $ 110,000 in legal costs. This continues to advance the interests of the parties. In addition, the preparation of the appeal procedure entails costs.

– The parties have not agreed fees. Both believe that they should be recognized and have asked the Supreme Court to rule on the matter. Riise thinks that the whole process was a waste of time and that it should never exist, writes the fire.

It is unclear when the Court of Appeal will have made its final decision on the costs litigation.


[ad_2]
Source link