[ad_1]
The alternative budget of the KrF state provides for tax increases of about NOK 10 billion compared to the government proposal. The largest item of expenditure is NOK 3.3 billion for the sole increase in family allowances.
Although the right and the frp feel it is totally unrealistic to spend so much money in the time allowed for the publication of the financial situation on November 20, nor the financial officer of Asheim nor the financial director of the frp, Helge André Njåstad, do not express stronger words than this is a "recognizable CRF policy". that it becomes "demanding".
Asheim recalls that the reason for the protection of childhood has remained unchanged at 970 dollars since 1996 is not a "failure syndrome".
– No, it's due to a real inter-political priority. Alternating governments up to the Bondevik 1 government have chosen to prioritize cash support, full coverage of child care and maximum price in kindergartens, he said.
"Going back to retirement in 3 years is very ambitious and very demanding," he said diplomatically.
The finalist of Venstres Abid Q. Raja is more positive about the solution:
"I am convinced that we are able to reach an agreement, we have achieved the last 10 budgets we have delayed, we speak the same language and trust each other," he says.
Raja says he has "sympathy" for KrF to increase child support in order to combat child poverty.
"Child insurance was also a topic for the left, but we favored free time and other measures," he said.
– Not applicable to the casting of new oil wells
What KrF wants to finance with higher taxes does not make things easier. Asheim and Njåstad both demand that new measures be financed by reductions in other countries, crown by crown.
It is inapplicable to put new billions of dollars of fresh oil in the state budget with an expenditure budget of NOK 1350 billion.
– Like the proposal of KrF, it is that Frp reduce taxes and fees. I did not see anyone talking about spending more money on oil than the government suggested. More in one area, less in another, says Njåstad.
– The increase in taxes and fees is very large for the three government parties. Plans must be covered by discounts elsewhere, says Asheim.
"KrF has already received a lot of impact
– Crown for crown?
– That's the starting point, yes. We can not include new oil crowns in the budget. We would also like to remind the KrF that they already have a lot of impact on the state budget, for example on assistance. It was not done in a political vacuum, Asheim says.
All indications are now that the government parties want to withdraw from the budget the most important political and economic proposals of the Iraqi budget for government negotiations.
Opposed to Aftenposten, it is stated that it will take time to analyze all the consequences of KrF's proposals against the current policy of the child and the family. A possible bet on the children's families must also be reconciled with the promises of the current government platform and the new – if the KrF agrees with the right, the franc and the left to enter the government .
"It's the KrF's budget if they decide it themselves," says a central source of the ruling parties about the KrF budget proposal.
Source link
