[ad_1]
Last year, the Oslo Police District discovered that a shot had been fired in one of the uniformed cars of the district
After the district of police did not find out who shot, the Bureau of Police Affairs was contacted for the first time
They were also not brought to the end of the case , which has now ended due to "missing information about the author". It shows a call from the specialized unit NRK has been granted.
– No one meant anything
Mona Skaaden-Bjerke, Legal Advisor in the Police Office, explains why it was difficult to know who was shooting:
– This is a car used by many in the police district. The incident was never reported, and no employee wanted to say anything about it. The investigations have not revealed what happened and who is the author.
In this case, a lot of things went wrong, admits the police of Oslo:
- The shooter was not reported.
- The special unit was late connected.
- No investigation has been conducted. sign up or say what they know.
– It is correctly summarized. This is criticized in several areas, "said Tore Soldal, head of the central police unit of Oslo, with the police car concerned.
– Reason to Believe People Covering
Verken The Investigation Bureau or Oslo Police Investigations have identified what happened and who shot
The case was therefore dropped.
– SERIOUS: The Tore Soldal Unit Head of the Oslo Police District says that he is looking very seriously at the wreckage
Photo: Lokman Ghorbani / NRK [19659018] The Soldal unit chief does not closely watch the fact that no police officer provided any information about this, despite the fact that they do not have any information about it. have not reported, they have been invited there
– I think it's very important.The chance that more than one person will know what happened is great. makes it very important. Then there may be reason to believe that people are covering each other. I think it's very little, says Soldal.
He acknowledges that it is very important for the police to investigate criminal cases, that current people say what they know or have seen. So the police should just continue with a good example, he believes.
– Yes, certainly. We rely on the trust of the people. Then we can not be so people can not trust us, "Soldal said.
Police: – Serious about the case
The bullet hole in the police car was discovered almost accidentally.The car was the subject of an investigation at the police district of Oslo workshop on December 18, 2000.
The mistake of The lock was probably due to the fact that a shot had been fired at the door of the car
so only the person or persons concerned were aware of when and why the blow fell.
– The case should have been reported, that this has not happened is serious.This event should not be kept secret, says Skaaden-Bjerke
Soldier in Oslo the police agreed
– The rules are clear: Moist blows must be reported immediately, and when the wet shovel has inflicted damage to your patrol iture, she crossed the side of the car, it is obvious that the case is serious. We consider it very serious that the incident was not reported immediately, says Soldal.
Four months before the attachment of the special unit
The investigation of the wet break-in is complicated, because the special assembly took a long time before to be seized
The case was reported to the Bureau last April – four months after the shot was discovered in the car
AUTOMOBILE RETIRED: He was in a Mercedes-Benz -Benz police car that the wet shot was first discovered after a locked door in the door. The police car in the photo has no connection with the police car in the case.
Photo: Braata, Espen / VG
Other members of the Oslo Police District had initially wanted to clean up the event after the discovery of the bullet.
Forensic investigations were conducted. In addition, the driving book of the car has been carefully examined. The investigations, however, gave no clear answer
Both Soldal in Oslo Police and the Bureau considered that the case should have been reported to the Office earlier.
– Basically, our investigation is earlier than we are informed. Then we can easily enter the case. But Oslo tried to understand this first – no luck, says Skaaden-Bjerke in the office.
In a report from the Oslo police, which is sent to the Bureau, it is said that the main theory is that with the deployment of service weapons or in connection with training.
KLARE ROUTINES: Sigve Bolstad in the police federation points out that there are clear procedures for reporting events such as shots.
Photo: Terje Pedersen / NTB scanpix
Sigve Bolstad, head of the Police Federation not the details of the case, but stresses, on a general basis, that there are clear procedures for such events.
– These events must be reported. There are also routines to know who to report to, "says Bolstad
– I have no information indicating that there is a" bad climate "to report if you did something wrong.
[ad_2]
Source link