"The murderers in Congo" – – Looking at the film in depth and using the details, here is my truth about the murder here

The first feature film "The Murderes in Congo" was released today. The film contains three versions of the murder of the driver of Joshua French and Tjostolv Moland, Abedi Kasongo, May 5, 2009 in Congo:

At Moland who is shooting with the shotgun, he comes from the jungle that kills Kasongo and from an ambiguous scene where the French themselves stand with a rifle facing the window of the car and Kasongo. In the film, the two Frenchmen and Moland are on the driver's side of the car for Kasongo when the film's plans fall. The very jungle jungle jungles also come from the driver's side.

Doubt

This detail of the action in the film contrasts with the Dagbladet newspaper of his day, as it was presented in the lawsuit against French and Moland. The image of the dead driver's head shows that the blow that killed Kasongo comes from the opposite side of the car.

Hennie now doubts Dagbladet.

– If you are sitting on a truth, as previously stated, why show three different stories about how Kasongo was killed?

– The truth is not so easy. If you see this movie, that it is sufficiently complete and that it captures the details that are reported to you, it is possible to arrive at what I mean, it is a truth objective, says Hennie to Dagbladet.

The article continues during the advertisement

– It has never been produced

– During the trial, images were shown showing that Kasongo had been shot on the other side. From the direction of the passenger side of the car?

– At that, I can say that Kasongo has never been reproduced, says Hennie.

"We have seen many pictures of Abedi Kasongo, knowing that it has never been reproduced." These three scenes are part of the research on the weapon with which he was shot. Congolese first thought of hail, but later made it a firearm.We know that this is not a shotgun, "says Hennie, who leaves the answer unanswered and passes at the next interview.

– Axel is not an investigator

Joshua French lawyer Hans Marius Graasvold told Dagbladet that French had seen the final version of the film and that the client was aware of the end of the film. French believes it's a good movie, according to Graasvold, who said the following about the hint that the French would have killed Abedi Kasongo.

– Ax Hennie is not an investigator. There are many temptations to comment, but it is not an investigative document, it is a feature film. That is why we all reported it. What terms and what they build, the film will be responsible for the filming bills. This is not interesting to enter a new proof. The film stands on its own legs as an artistic product, says the lawyer.

Hennie does not want to comment on Graasvold's statement.

– Do not look for an answer

Director Marius Holst told Dagbladet that he was not looking for an answer to "murders".

"I have not looked for it.I study the circumstances and events and think that it is more interesting to let the audience look for the answer.The film will not give you an answer, so "It's probably impossible." There are many opinions, including those who worked with the film, says Holst.

– Did that mean that a clear position had to be taken?

"I can not talk about it," said Holst.

"Saw Kasongo who was killed, could not he deserve a clear position if you" know "?

"It was so far, we managed to develop our research, I understand your question and I can say it was discussed, it's not something we've taken lightly, said Holst.

Here you can read Dagbladet's review of the theories and explanations that have been published about the massacres over the years, as well as the chronology of the eve of the fatal night and the stories of French during his lecture tour.