[ad_1]
DOMESTICATED
She paved the way in the fight for the act of abortion. Now Gro Harlem Brundtland is making a powerful settlement with Prime Minister Erna Solberg (H) and the Christian People's Party.
published: Updated: 06.11.18 22:42
It's not so often that the former prime minister and ap-leader Gro Harlem Brundtland (79) interfere with Norwegian policy.
But when someone tries to weaken the woman's right to abortion, the country's former killer fails to stay still.
"I think it's obvious that the majority of the Storting will be a guarantee that this outrageous attack will never be implemented," she said against VG.
She is currently in a meeting abroad and responds in the affirmative to VG 's interview request, but for practical reasons, she had to be taken by e – mail.
"There is no such" columbi egg ""
She writes that she reacted with wonder at the "noisy expenses of the prime minister around abortion law a few weeks ago ":
"Unfortunately, we have witnessed a totally unworthy double game," she writes.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg Previously she was an ardent defender of the abortion law, but she was subjected to a hardening in 2013 when she went to abolish the abortion law, according to which a serious illness of the fetus should no longer be an independent criterion of abortion.
Now she opens up again for the KrF interpreter as tightening. This is disappointing Gro Harlem Brundtland.
– I was scared everywhere in this game.
– Can you clarify what you mean by unworthy double play?
"It is unworthy to give the impression that there is a simple solution to an insoluble problem.
Brundtland declares that there is no solution that meets the wishes of Solberg and KrF.
"It is simply impossible, by camouflage and the play on words, to reconcile two clear oppositions: tighten the criteria for granting abortions after the 12th of the week – while maintaining the rights of the There is no such "columbi egg", she writes and adds:
– Do not talk about strengthening it, as we hear now from the right.
read also
Listhaug about the case of abortion: – A question of conscience
She has a long experience as both a doctor of law and a politician.
She warns against the consequences of the change to paragraph 2c of the Abortion Act that pregnancy can be interrupted after week 12. "If the fetus is not viable".
– Do you think that such a change in the treatment of the student can be balanced, as Høie claims, by the fact that female students should put more emphasis on evaluation by women of their own situation?
read also (VG +)
Four women say: So we aborted
"I think that Høie's comments only confirm that you are speaking against better knowledge.A number of conditions will result in serious injuries and disabilities, even if it does not mean that the fetus is not viable. Brundtland responds to VG: "insist more on the assessment of their own situation by women".
The battle takes place around Erna Solberg on October 18th. open to change the law on abortion. His abortion flirt is claimed to have been crucial at the annual meetings and the National Assembly on Friday, barely a majority of them chose to launch explorations to enter the current government of Solberg.
read also
Erns abortbløff
It is article 2c of the law on abortion that is at stake:
"After the end of the twelfth week of pregnancy, an outbreak of childbirth may occur when the risk of serious illness of the child is high, due to hereditary facilities, diseases or adverse effects during pregnancy," indicates the report.
Appropriate sources confirmed that a solution to the CRC requirement is to delete paragraph 2c and replace it with a new paragraph. This section will then be based on the fact that the pregnancy can be canceled after week 12. "If the fetus is not viable".
Health Minister Bent Høie (H) believes that the tightening can be balanced if "the committees pay more attention to the assessment by women of their own situation".
– impossible task
Harlem Brundtland is harsh in his judgment of such a horse trade:
– The law needs to be changed, the medical criteria are removed, but not the practice, they say. Quibble! It does not matter, she says, asking:
"What kind of discussion do you think the layperson should have with desperate women who have been told that something is really wrong with the child they carry?
– Should not they discuss the reason for their abortion request?
– And instead, let the woman look for temporary, constructive, social or economic arguments?
Before she answers:
"This is becoming an unworthy situation for all parties, and an impossible task for the physicians involved, when the actual medical indications have simply been removed from the law.
– Leaving all the way out of the problem
She feared great uncertainty and weakened the protection of the right of women to have an abortion.
– The idea of using the term "viable" if the fetus is a substitute for the current section 2c leads to disorder. It's obvious, she writes to VG.
Erna on a journey
Prime Minister Erna Solberg will travel Tuesday night without being able to answer VG's questions regarding Gro Harlem Brundtland's statements, State Secretary Rune Alstadsæter (H) told the Prime Minister's office.
Deputy Minister and Minister of Health Bent Høie responds in place and contrasts sharply with Gro.
– This is a totally unreasonable attack on the Prime Minister. She responded to a concrete challenge from KrF leaders who wanted to know if the right-wing party and the Labor Party could negotiate these issues. She responded to the name of the right "yes". Støre essentially refused, according to Høie.
He adds:
– Here, the Labor Party is trying to advance the outcome of negotiations that have not yet begun. It sounds so noisy, Høie writes in an email to VG on Tuesday night.
He then writes the same thing, as Erna Solberg says an update on his Facebook page Tuesday. Solberg pointed out in his own blog October 19 that government cooperation implies that everyone must get and give.
– It is not a good policy to change paragraph 2c of the abortion law of today. Any amendment to the abortion law will be the subject of negotiation between four parties. The right has no finished text in the negotiations. But we said we were willing to discuss difficult problems with KrF, writes Høie.
He understands that people are responding to the debate.
"When we have the impression that the right will make abortion more difficult and threaten the rights of women, many will naturally be upset, but it is not like that." The right is willing to discuss how we can discuss ethical issues in the face of technological and medical developments.In the future we will be able to learn more about the disease and fetal abnormalities.Therefore, the right believes that women's assessments are the weight of a weight.At the same time, I think that it is possible to obtain a piece of legislation that is not discriminatory, writes Bent Høie.
He also comes with a thank you for the last one at Big Party.
– Finally, when we had this discussion, Ap was a serious statement that the right would force women to give birth to children without brains. It is important for us to make it clear that no one is obliged to give birth to children who are not viable, "said Høie, who aims to a statement from former Deputy Director Helga Pedersen six years ago.
Olaug Bollestad, deputy leader of the KrF, rejects the outrageous game of Erna Solberg and KrF.
read also
Abortion law is not a bargaining card!
"A debate on this case is simply not an unworthy double game, but a very important debate about how we can counter a sorting community." The fact that Ap once again asserts that self-determination The woman is threatened when this right is preserved as before in the law is demanding against KrF had the same experience with Ap during the debate on bookings in 2014, writes Bollestad in an email to VG.
– Erna Solberg and yourself do you give the impression that there is a simple solution to an insoluble problem, as Gro claims?
"I do not think it's an inseparable challenge, but I think nobody takes it into account, but we think it's worthwhile to debate and find solutions that remove the discriminatory part of it. of the law, while the woman assesses the situation Bollestad always responds.
Here you can find out more about
Source link
