[ad_1]
Images and performance for NVIDIA’s upcoming RTX 3060 Ti graphics card have been leaked by Videocardz (who else). NVIDIA’s RTX 3060 Ti graphics card will feature 4,864 CUDA cores and be faster than the older RTX 2080 SUPER and priced at just $ 399. The card is expected to launch in early December and is expected to kill NVIDIA’s mid-range lineup.
NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti images and performance leaked, landing December 2, 2020
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti will feature a GA104-200 GPU with 4864 CUDA cores and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 14 Gbps. The bus width will be 256 bits for a total bandwidth of 448 GB / s of bandwidth. Since the board will require less power, the TBP should be around 200W with the reference design clocked at around 180W. This is a 5W increase over the RTX 2070 at 175W and in line with how we would expect the Samsung node to be fair in terms of power efficiency compared to TSMC’s nodes. It is expected to have an MSRP of $ 399 and will launch on December 2.
The Founder’s Edition variant features the now familiar metallic black aesthetic of the RTX 3080 and RTX 3090, but both fans are on the top of the board with a small cutout in the backplate visible on the back. The overall shape and form of the Founder’s Edition is very consistent with the RTX 3000 series. The fan towards the end of the board will push air through the heatsink and out the bottom – which is a philosophy of interesting design compared to graphics cards from the beginning of this decade.
When it comes to benchmarks, the RTX 3060 Ti is faster than the RTX 2080 SUPER and should trade hits with the RTX 2080 Ti. It’s faster not only for shader performance, but also for rendering (computation) and ray tracing capabilities and completely demolishes the old RTX 2060 SUPER it replaces. Of course, as with any benchmark comparison, always keep in mind that you should wait for third party results before making a decision.
Keep in mind that the reason NVIDIA RTX 3090 and RTX 3080 cards do not scale linearly in performance is due to the bottleneck of game engines and binaries that are not designed for performance. manage so many hearts. We know that the hardware and driver stack evolves in a linear fashion due to the benchmark performance of these cards in software such as vRAY and Octane – which are designed to handle a huge amount of graphics power. This means that when you shrink cores, performance do not reduce linearly. In fact, I would expect the RTX 3060 Ti to beat the RTX 2080 clock for the clock! Assuming a few fewer clocks than the RTX 2080 Ti, it should easily swap hits with the old flagship.
Yields for the initial few batches of the Samsung 8nm node are lower than expected and expensive. The company expects a significant improvement in yields (and therefore wafer prices) in the coming months. To protect its shareholders, the company was cautious about its orders for the first batches and placed significantly higher volume orders for subsequent batches. This problem was further exacerbated by robots scratching all the volume right off the bat. We expect wholesale orders to start arriving by the end of the year (assuming, again, the miners don’t buy into all of this of course).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series ‘Ampere’ graphics card specifications:
| Graphics card name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti? | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti? | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Ampere GA107 | GA106 ampere? | GA106 ampere? | Ampere GA104-200 | Ampere GA104-300 | Ampere GA102-150 | Ampere GA102-200 | Ampere GA102-250 | Ampere GA102-300 |
| Process node | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm |
| Die Size | TBA | TBA | TBA | 395.2 mm2 | 395.2 mm2 | 628.4 mm2 | 628.4 mm2 | 628.4 mm2 | 628.4 mm2 |
| Transistors | TBA | TBA | TBA | 17.4 billion | 17.4 billion | 28 billion | 28 billion | 28 billion | 28 billion |
| CUDA colors | 2304 | 3584 | 3840 | 4864 | 5888 | 7424 | 8704 | 10496 | 10496 |
| TMU / ROP | TBA | TBA | TBA | 152/80 | 184/96 | 232/80 | 272/96 | 328/112 | 328/112 |
| Tensor / RT hearts | TBA | TBA | TBA | 152/38 | 184/46 | 232/58 | 272/68 | 328/82 | 328/82 |
| Basic clock | TBA | TBA | TBA | 1410 MHz | 1,500 MHz | TBA | 1440 MHz | TBA | 1,400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | TBA | TBA | TBA | 1665 MHz | 1730 MHz | TBA | 1710 MHz | TBA | 1700 MHz |
| FP32 calculation | TBA | TBA | TBA | 16.2 TFLOP | 20 TFLOP | TBA | 30 TFLOP | TBA | 36 TFLOP |
| RT TFLOP | TBA | TBA | TBA | 32.4 TFLOP | 40 TFLOP | TBA | 58 TFLOP | TBA | 69 TFLOP |
| Tensor-TOP | TBA | TBA | TBA | TBA | 163 TOP | TBA | 238 TOP | TBA | 285 TOP |
| Memory capacity | 4 GB of GDDR6? | 6 GB of GDDR6? | 6 GB of GDDR6? | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | 10 GB of GDDR6X? | 10 GB GDDR6X | 20 GB of GDDR6X | 24 GB GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 128 bits | 192 bits? | 192 bits? | 256 bits | 256 bits | 320 bits | 320 bits | 320 bits | 384 bits |
| Memory speed | TBA | TBA | TBA | 14 Gbit / s | 14 Gbit / s | TBA | 19 Gbit / s | 19 Gbit / s | 19.5 Gbit / s |
| Bandwidth | TBA | TBA | TBA | 448 Gbit / s | 448 Gbit / s | TBA | 760 Gbit / s | 760 Gbit / s | 936 Gbit / s |
| TGP | 90W? | TBA | TBA | 180W? | 220 W | 320W? | 320 W | 320 W | 350 W |
| Price (MSRP / FE) | $ 149? | $ 199? | $ 299? | $ 399? | US $ 499 | $ 599? | US $ 699 | $ 899? | $ 1,499 |
| Launch (availability) | 2021? | 2021? | 2021? | November 2020? | October 29 | Q4 2020? | September 17 | January 2021? | September 24 |
[ad_2]
Source link