[ad_1]
Democratic Republic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezGOP is stepping up efforts to recruit candidates, Ocasio-Cortez and progressives denounce politico-antisemitic illustration & # 39; by Bernie Sanders Biden under climate pressure from environmentalists MORE (N.Y.) criticized the New York Times Sunday for an article on President Trump
Donald John TrumpPapadopoulos about AG's new powers: "Trump is now on the offensive" Pelosi uses Trump to his advantage Mike Pence delivers West Point's opening speech NEXTformer director of communication of Hope Hicks
Hope Charlotte HicksThe Morning's Morning Report – Pelosi remains firm despite new pressure for removal Trump defends the denial of McGahn's testimony Democrat House leaders urge Trump's indictment, claiming that their coverage of his decision to comply with a subpoena was referred to as "a lifetime drama called" The choice of hope "."
The first-year lawmaker wrote two tweets echoing the article's reviews, which deal with Hicks' story at the White House and how she might react to the Speaker's Judiciary of the House . Jerrold Nadler
Jerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerDemocrats are running out of scams to pull the impeachment book Trump asks if Nadler will look at the emails 'deleted and cleaned up at the acidic' ################################################################################ of Clinton Trump tweets the criticisms of the conservative commentator against the director of FBI MOREThe recent subpoena of (D-N.Y.) For that she testifies as part of an extensive investigation into the Trump administration.
"What makes me say, is that the woman suspects a crime in Congress and that the NYT describes it as a drama of her life called" Hope's Choice "(" The Choice of Hope "), Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a tweet.
"Immediately after the shooting, the media regularly publishes threatening photos of victims of people of color + bring back anything dubious of their lives," she wrote in another tweet. "But when Hope Hicks plans not to comply with a subpoena, now is the time for her success."
What leads me to believe is that the woman suspects a crime in Congress and the NYT describes it as a life-long drama called "Hope's Choice."
This is a fmr administration official who plans to participate in a camouflage operation led by the president.
Treat it too. https://t.co/XcNbSuU4QB
– Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) May 26, 2019
Yep. Where is the "no angel" take now?
Immediately after the shooting, the media regularly publishes threatening photos of victims of people of color + picking up anything questionable they have made.
But when Hope Hicks considers that he does not bow to a subpoena, it's time for success. https://t.co/ACnvXlKF7Q
– Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) May 26, 2019
Ocio-Cortez's critics add to those of the media who said that non-compliance with a subpoena was a crime and not an act "to be decided".
I think the idea of existential is not that if it obeys, it will cease to exist, but that if it obeys, it will cease to be a source of energy. hope https://t.co/XTLMna8Tip
– Elizabeth Bruenig (@ebruenig) May 26, 2019
Hope Hicks can not "decide" anything. She received a subpoena from Congress. If she were not white, rich and connected, we would not have this conversation. She would appear or face the threat of prison like all of us. As she should. https://t.co/giDCcvIxvf
– Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith) May 26, 2019
Maybe Hope Hicks can claim an existential privilege … https://t.co/4qb0Vd5Deo
– Julia Macfarlane (@juliamacfarlane) May 26, 2019
I fully understand Hope Hicks' dilemma. At the moment, I am confronted with the existential question "Should I rob a bank?
I'm ready for my glam shot now if I could get this fake eyelash glue right dagnabbit https://t.co/cUiJaL4ezM
– Imani Gandy (@AngryBlackLady) May 26, 2019
Subpoenas from members of the House have become the focus of a White House-congressional dispute investigating the Speaker.
President Trump ordered former White House lawyer Don McGahn not to comply with a subpoena earlier this month, prompting Nadler to threaten him with despising him.
[ad_2]
Source link