Oscars 2019: Takeaway Oscars "Without Host"

[ad_1]

Like the Grammys, the Oscars have recorded a modest audience gain, after an alarming fall in 2018. Yet the lessons that the Academy can apply in the future are not entirely clear – in part because of all the variables at play – other than the fact that efforts to change or evolve the show and its format significantly, including nominees and winners, will face stiff resistance from the part of the traditionalists who would protect the institution.

While browsing the remains of the Oscars night, here are five points to remember and the areas that the Academy will surely consider in post-mortem conversations:

Oscar's ratings show a clear improvement over the record level of last year, reaching 29.6 million viewers, according to data from Nielsen, up 12%. Again, with the nominees of the blockbusters, top talent like Lady Gaga – likely to attract viewers who might not have looked otherwise – and the lure of a wreckage train that doesn ' is not materialized, the Oscars have owned enough. a slight rise would have left the Academy as panicked as the organizers sometimes watched him approaching the awards.

Notably, the Oscar scheme reflects the Grammys, which also dropped in 2018 and rebounded earlier this month. In today's crowded broadcast environment, mere serving serves as a reason to jump over the net in terms of tennis, even if the lower level becomes the new normal.

L & # 39; host

The Oscars have usually introduced the presenter as a means of promoting the show because it is one of the few new items from year to year. In a certain way, the absence of a host fulfilled this role this year – wondering what the show would look like – and the fact of not having to serve his shtick helped streamline the ceremony and to focus on the candidates.

Nevertheless, giving up a host does not constitute a change that can still be adopted in perpetuity. This is an option, but not a panacea.

The structure

the Academy has withdrawn from its project to present four technical categories during commercial breaks – despite the retreat of its members – and the enthusiastic speeches of some of the less-announced winners have clearly pleaded for their retention in the show. .

That said, there are no other televised awards for honors for films such as documentaries and animated shorts that virtually no viewers have seen, and for poorly understood technical skills such as sound mixing. Running in these categories – having a single pair of presenters to distribute several quick-fire awards – simply makes sense, at least, until the Academy may inevitably try again to dismiss them. of television broadcasting.

In the current state of affairs, other mandatory elements, such as the "In Memoriam" segment and the recognition of the laureates of all time, have felt somewhat truncated. It is clear that this year's commitment to shorten the show – which lasted even more than three hours – will not go away, given ABC's commitment in this strategy.

The nominees / winners

The Academy got rid of its "popular film" category project and was nominated and even awarded several honors to some popular films, including "Black Panther", "Bohemian Rhapsody" and "A Star is Born".

This green paper & # 39; Oscar is so our country right now

Problem solved? Not exactly. "Green Paper" is revealed to be a very controversial choice for the best image. But it seemed like a more conventional choice, as his two main rivals ran into historical obstacles: "Black Panther" is a superhero movie, a genre the Academy had never deigned to name before; and "Roma" are from Netflix, a streaming service that, despite the millions spent on promotion, remains a major player in the movies and is actually a threat to the basic theater model.

In hindsight, the example of the "Lord of the Rings" could be the most informative, because the third film of the trilogy, "The return of the king", finally won the best picture in 2004, in a recognition of the director Peter Jackson's overall achievement.

For a movie like "Black Panther" to win, considering the recent history of the Oscars, it will probably take such pioneers, the recipients relying on what they have achieved. The same is probably true for "Roma", while Netflix seems determined to exhaust the film sector, reflecting its approach to television.

Inclusion

Many greeted the diversity of winners and nominees at the Oscars, just a few years after the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag.

The second look of Melissa McCarthy's Oscars is #goals

Despite the Academy's deliberate efforts to tackle the problem, it is an area in which the organization remains dependent on the companies submitting films for consideration.

In simple terms, greater abundance of on-screen opportunities – more bats for movies made by people of color and featuring people of color – will give more candidates.

On the plus side, the success of movies like "Black Panther" and "Crazy Rich Asians" should pave the way for others. And if one thing has remained true in Hollywood, even in these rapidly changing times, it's the old adage that says nothing succeeds as much as success.

[ad_2]

Source link