[ad_1]
"They are the future," she said. "We are in good hands with young people like that."
When announcing the winners on Monday, half a dozen student writers who gathered around the computer screen with their educational consultant, Melissa Falkowski, performed with a little of disappointment having missed a prize. Yet they had nevertheless been honored before a national audience.
"They do not usually mention the losers," said 36-year-old Falkowski.
On Tuesday, the initial disappointment had become a real pride.
"The work that our paper did last year – and continues to do this year – is the most worthwhile job we have done and will ever do," said Ms. Kapoor, a senior who intends to stay in journalism once she enters the University of Princeton University.
Ms. Kapoor participated in the preparation of the Pulitzer registration in January, submitting the work of The Eagle Eye in the public service award categories and the latest news after investigating whether student registrations were excluded from the competition. (They are not.) As for journalists conditioned to work on time, Parkland students began to compile their applications two days before the deadline.
The Eagle Eye editors have realized that an entry in 17 obituaries and a series of stories about student activism against gun violence would be an atypical choice for Pulitzers, who tend to reward the great investigative reports and the writing of sublime feature films. They therefore included a note telling the judges that their work was important because it offered a distinct perspective on the trauma of students as a result of the massacre.
"I was very happy that they took us seriously," said Dara Rosen, a 17-year-old young writer and editor. "It's really difficult, but at the same time very stimulating, to be able to write, from an insider's point of view, what your school is going through and what's going on."
No staff member was forced to cover the shooting, but many editors volunteered to write the obituaries themselves.
[ad_2]
Source link