[ad_1]
Banco Mundia conducted an internal inquiry into sexual harassment at the workplace. The results of this survey, consulted by the newspaper El País revealed that 25% of women and 4% of men, who work in this lender, were victims of sexual harassment.
According to the survey of more than 5,000 employees, only 12% filed a complaint or complaint about episodes of harassment and the majority of women who complained were dissatisfied with the treatment of their case ]
The survey also reveals that the majority of cases of abuse were recorded at the World Bank headquartered in Washington where two thirds of the employees work. The survey defines harassment as cases of "undesirable advancement, requests for sexual favors" or any other sexual action that interferes with employment or creates an intimidating environment.
Employees do not report out of fear
The newspaper El País explains that the results, which were released internally in May, reveal workers' fear of reporting abuses. . Of those who did not complain publicly, 32% feared consequences if they did, 27% felt that nothing had changed and 23% did not trust the system.
Of those who reported, 50% were dissatisfied with the result compared to 38% satisfied. Another relevant fact: 18% of those who have filed a complaint have publicly suffered retaliation.
Faced with this unfortunate scenario, the World Bank announced measures to deal with these cases of abuse as hiring a consultant to analyze the system. investigation of complaints of a sexual nature and forcing all employees to take a course on the prevention of harassment and to speed up the process of investigation.
Case of harassment at the World Bank
According to the newspaper El País there are known cases of sexual harassment at the World Bank with benevolent responses.
In December 2016, the Administrative Court of the organization ruled that an employee should not have been returned in 2014 to the headquarters of Washington placed his mobile phone under the skirt of a worker to "take inappropriate pictures or videos of it without
The Court concluded that even if it had" committed a fault ", the decision to terminate the contract of the employee was "considerably disproportionate".
[ad_2]
Source link
