[ad_1]
The New York Times responded to President Donald Trump's tweet on Sunday, describing his recent meeting with the newspaper's publisher, AG Sulzberger.
Trump had tweeted that he had "a very good and interesting" meeting with Sulzberger, the sixth member. from his family to serve as publisher since they bought the Times in 1896.
"I spent a lot of time talking about the large amount of Fake News aired by the media" Trump, who often – and falsely – accused him of having a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with AG Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times. I spent a lot of time talking about the huge amounts of Fake News broadcast by the media and how Fake News turned into a phrase, "Enemy of the People".
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2018
Shortly after, the Times weighed in with the additional context of the exchange.
The White House asked Sulzberger to meet with Trump earlier this month, Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy said. an email on Sunday.
"This was not unusual," The New York Times editors organize such meetings with presidents and other public figures who are concerned about coverage, "Murphy writes (19659007). July 20, Sulzberger and James Bennet, editor of the Times editorial page, met with Trump at the White House, according to Murphy.While Trump's assistants requested that the meeting be unofficial, Trump's tweet on Sunday put the meeting "on the record," allowing Sulzberger to respond, she said. "My main purpose for accepting the meeting was to raise concerns about the president. deeply disturbing anti-press rhetoric, "said Sulzberger in a statement to HuffPost." I told the president directly that I thought his tongue was not only divisive but that it was becoming more and more dangerous. "
" I clearly said that I was not asking that he mitigate his attacks on the Times. unfair, "he added. "I rather pleaded to reconsider his more general attacks on journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country."
Read the full statement below:
My main purpose for accepting the meeting was the president's deeply troubling anti-press rhetoric
I told the president directly that I thought his tongue It was not only a source of divisions but more and more dangerous.
I told him that the phrase "false news" is false and harmful, I am much more concerned about his labeling of journalists "the enemy of the people". I warned that this inflammatory language contributes to an increase in threats against journalists and will lead to violence.
I have repeatedly stressed that this is especially true, where the president's rhetoric is used by some regimes to justify a massive crackdown on journalists. I warned that it was putting lives at risk, that it was undermining the democratic ideals of our nation, and that it was eroding one of the greatest exports of our country: a commitment to freedom of life. Expression and freedom of the press.
He pointed out that if President Trump, like the previous Presidents, was unhappy with the coverage of his administration, he was naturally free to tell the world. I've made it clear repeatedly that I was not asking that he mitigate his attacks on the Times because he felt our coverage was unfair. Instead, I implored him to reconsider his broader attacks on journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country.
Trump often accuses the Times and other media outlets, including the Washington Post, CNN, and NBC, in response to articles that describe him in an unflattering manner.
Trump has frequently lit up stories that use anonymous sources to report on his white house. In March, for example, tweeted that the Times had "deliberately written a fake story" suggesting that he was "dissatisfied" with his legal team and that he was planning to d & # 39; hire another lawyer.
But in May, Trump did exactly that by replacing Ty Cobb's lawyer by Emmet T. Flood, a lawyer who represented former President Bill Clinton during his dismissal in the late 1990s.
Trump has repeatedly described the press as "the enemy of the people", despite the false suggestion of his Sunday tweet that the phrase entered alone into the zeitgeist.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Times statement
CORRECTION : A photo of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., former publisher of the Times and father of AG Sulzberger, accompanied this story. It has been replaced by a photo of AG Sulzberger.
[ad_2]
Source link
