Transparency International identified the "responsible" by stupid contributors



[ad_1]


  The director of Transparency International, Delia Ferreira, revealed that in some countries the legislation has been completely changed prohibiting corporate contributions in political campaigns.


The director of Transparency International, Delia Ferreira, revealed that in some countries changed the legislation totally prohibiting corporate contributions in political campaigns.

The NGO Transparency International has identified the "leaders" of election campaigns with delicate contributors: the parties.

According to the director of the NGO specializing in the analysis of election funds, Delia Ferreira Rubio the scandal with Cambiemos is "disturbing" because the maneuver was a "manifest" violation of the Political Financing Act. "There, it is established that anonymous contributions can not be received and that the parties have the obligation to declare the origin of the funds by individualizing each of the donors," he said.

"In the case of the campaign in the province of Buenos Aires Aires joined a list of names that proved not to be the real contributors, but a leading donor to cover the origin of the l & # 39; 39, silver which has been used ", describes.

Currently, three different causes are treated by fake donors. An investigation is carried out within the framework of the criminal justice with the electoral competence of La Plata, in the Court n ° 2 of the judge Adolfo Gabino Ziulu and with the participation of the prosecutor Jorge Di Lello . The other two are channeled by the federal criminal court, with interventions by the judges Sebastián Casanello and the platense Ernesto Kreplak. For Ferreira, in the three searches there is a coincidence. "There are no solid answers from the officials, who are neither the administrations nor the accountants, but the (political) parties," he said, minimizing the departure of accountant María Fernanda Inzade of the Bonaer administration

. , according to the head of the computer, in this scandal is added a "new element", which is not common to other complaints by truchos contributors. "The alleged access to personal databases that need to be protected by competent authorities such as ANSeS or the Department of Social Development The problem would be the violation of the secrecy of the database for the use of these identities "emphasized Ferreira.

"The cases of tricky taxpayers have been since the law requires that they report, but do not consistently correspond to a category of people receiving subsidies, as in this case", added in dialogue with Futurock

But in addition to the alleged irregularities in the campaign conducted Maria Eugenia Vidal, Esteban Bullrich, Graciela Ocaña and Gladys Gonzalez in the province, the emphasis was put now on contributions received by change in the city. "It was discovered that there was a concordance between a list of city employees, who had received an additional assignment for their work, and a list of donors with exactly the same amount of money. that each employee had received, "warned the expert. 19659006] "If this is proven, there is abuse of public funds for proselytism and embezzlement of public funds under the Penal Code," he warned: "For years we have been calling for the strengthening of the House National Electoral Accounts With seven auditors can not control the financing of all campaigns.To access the database to do the control, it is essential to cross the information with something " s & # 39 is complaining to the lawyer and consultant. 19659012] President Macri receives Delia Ferreira Rubio, head of the organization Transparency International, in his office. pic.twitter.com/1RpFee0Vwu

– Casa Rosada (@CasaRosada) November 27, 2017

In this line, Ferreira rejected the arguments of the leaders of the PRO, who claim that these cases they are produced by errors in the law. "What happened to the trickster contributors has nothing to do with the flaws of the law, which is absolutely clear: it forbids the anonymity of donations and obliges us to spell out the origin of the fund "

" One of the points The government presents as a way to correct what has happened, it is the issue of the banking of contributions.The current law states that contributions can be made by Bank transfer and also in cash, which does not mean that they do not, must declare the origin, a receipt must be handed over " clarified.

"The contribution of companies was authorized by law until 2009. From there, they were banned from contributing to the campaigns, but they were allowed for ordinary financing of parties, accounts have been unified: there is no more account per campaign, but a total, " added.

Explaining how party financing is done in other countries, the director of Transpare Ncia explained: "Around the world, there has been a tendency to try to resolve the issue of capturing political decisions by the business groups by totally banning the contributions of companies.This prohibition only complicates the transparency regarding the origin of the funds. "

" What the law does now with the draft executive power is to re-authorize the funding of legal entities, not just the original funding, but also campaigns with a 2% limit on allowed campaign expenses – in other words, all on an equal footing. " he said.

[ad_2]
Source link