Pete Buttigieg avoids the question about the compulsory buyout of an "assault weapon" during an interview with CNN



[ad_1]

Pete Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Indiana, presidential candidate for 2020, declined Sunday to say he would support a buyout program for so-called assault weapons when he was elected president , during an interview with CNN.

The Democrat appeared in "State of the Union", where host Jake Tapper asked why he would not join his other presidential candidate, Beto O. Rourke, to support such a move.

"Beto O'Rourke is in favor of compulsory redemptions for the so-called assault weapons … you stopped before that," said Tapper. "But if you think that the so-called assault weapons do not belong to our neighborhoods … why would not you support the compulsory redemption of assault weapons?"

Buttigieg said that the United States still had a lot to do with gun control and had referred to background checks, red flag laws and the ban on high-capacity magazines, but did not address the issue. issue of redemptions.

BUTTIGIEG STAFF CALLS THE GOP CONGRESSMAN TO PRESENT HIS REMEMBRANCE THAT HE WAS REACHED BY URINE

"Well, I think we have a lot of work to do right now on the basics," he replied. "Universal background checks, red flag laws, a ban on new sales of these assault weapons and high capacity magazines.

"Things that the majority, in many cases, the vast majority of Americans support, but are still unfinished, I think we need to deal with some fundamentals, and then we'll try to find a solution. so that we are not forever the only country with more firearms than human beings ".

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Buttigieg was one of the first candidates in 2020 to make a public call for firearms control following the shooting earlier this month in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio. He said at the time: "We can not allow the Second Amendment to be a death sentence for thousands of Americans every year."

Buttigieg's remarks came as gun control activists held rallies Sunday in much of the country to demand tougher federal laws.

[ad_2]

Source link