[ad_1]
The complaint is filed by a private citizen named Rjhay Laurea, the same person who filed the opposition against Marquez's application for justice of the Supreme Court
COMPLAINT. A private citizen named Rjhay Laurea files a registry complaint against the administrator of the Midas Marquez Court to the Office of the Ombudsman on July 2, 2018. Photo of Rappler
MANILA, Philippines – L & # 39; Midas Marquez judicial administrator continues to be haunted by the 2012 issue of the World Bank that involved him in the misuse of millions of pesos of funds awarded to the Supreme Court for projects of reform.
A private citizen named Rjhay Laurea filed a complaint against Marquez with the Office of the Ombudsman on Monday, July 2nd. accusing Marquez of committing an offense and breaking the code of conduct and ethical standards.
Laurea also filed an objection on 21 June to Márquez's candidacy for the Supreme Court, but the Judicial Council and the Bar has pre-selected it. June 25th.
World Bank Audit
The question dates back to 2012, when the World Bank audited the funds it granted to the Supreme Court Project to Support Judicial Reform or JRSP
In the World Bank audit report, $ 8.6 million of funds spent by the Court were found to be "ineligible" because They were not approved in the purchase plan. The World Bank asked the SC of to return the P8.6 million.
The report of the World Bank indicated that 16 ineligible expenses "relate" to the office of the court administrator, headed up to here by Marquez. ] "Because of the combination of his appointments and his duties, this senior official was the plaintiff of the services, the approver of the specifications, the end user of the services provided by the company, the author of the contract extensions and Laurea says that the World Bank was clearly referring to Marquez.
In a previous response to Rappler, Marquez said: "World Bank project and funds have never exceeded despite my many positions, it was under the program management office or the Prime Minister's office that had never been entrusted to me. "
" It's an old complaint that can not even be attributed to me, "Marquez added.
The complaint accuses Ma The complainant also accused Marquez of violating the code of conduct, in particular section 4, which obliges public servants to "show obvious partiality, obvious bad faith and negligence gross and inexcusable ". "
" He even spent the JSRSP allowance to extend his influence to insiders such as meals, accommodation, airline tickets and allowances for judges, conference recordings , computer hardware and games of good will, "Laurea said.
Laurea added:" The JRSP is a missed opportunity for judicial reform. The noble purpose of the World Bank to finance the JRSP is to build public confidence in the Philippine justice system. Yet this noble intent was paralyzed by the inflexible and inappropriate control of the implementation of the project by the respondent Marquez. "
Mark did not respond to our request for comment at the time of writing." – Rappler.com
Source link
