Greta Gerwig's "little women" can happen and the cast already looks starred

The day Lady Bird began broadcasting on Amazon Prime was a big hit for me, because I'm still not above what her director and screenwriter Greta Gerwig is a passionate filmmaker. After seeing the success of Lady Bird and becoming the fifth woman nominated for the Academy Award for Best Director, Gerwig remained relatively silent on the sequel, but now we have an idea of ​​the film project to which the director 39, is currently attacking. It may be her next job as a director, and the rumors already show glimpses of stars.

According to Variety Gerwig "Eyes" a Columbia Pictures recounting Louisa May Alcott's original novel about four sisters arriving at age in post-civil war America. The adaptation of the film would come shortly after a PBS mini-series starring Angela Lansbury, Emily Watson and newcomer Maya Hawke. As a book lover well versed in the dramas of the British era, I thought that miniseries actors were the pinnacle of strong casting, but suspicions about leading actresses will play the women of the March to Gerwig. The film already includes the best of Hollywood starlets.

Oscar winners Meryl Streep and Emma Stone are supposed to be featured in the film, and although it's unclear who is linked to which role, Streep is clearly meant to play Marmee, the loving and wise mother March sisters. The fault with the voice and roundness of Stone who looked totally like Katharine Hepburn, who played the heroine Jo in an adaptation of 1933 Little Women but I only see her play that l '. tomboy writer in this story. I can already imagine Stone as Jo cutting his hair and putting on pants instead of a skirt to run to the outside.

Mike Coppola / Getty Images Entertainment / Getty Images & Dia Dipasupil / Getty Images Entertainment / Getty Images

Of course, it is impossible not to connect Gerwig to Lady Bird, and while 39, it might not be a Lady Bird continued, Little Women could bring us the meeting of Gerwig with two of his young stars Lady Bird . Oscar nominees Saoirse Ronan and Timothee Chalamet are also discussing adaptation, but it's hard to tell if the former 1945-19003 Lady Bird couple will find themselves in this version with Amy and Laurie. The 22-year-old English actress, Florence Pugh, is also related to production, and her age alone might give her a better look for the youngest sister, Amy.

Variety also reports that several actresses are likely to audition for Beth's third sister, opposed to Stone, before July 4, which is no doubt a better indication that Stone will play Jo. The two sisters have a special connection in the original story, and Jo is especially Beth's main nurse when she gets sick halfway through the book. Although a tweet from The Hollywood Reporter claims that 29-year-old Stone will play the oldest sister Meg and that Ronan, 24, will play Jo, the exact cast is not confirmed. This means that I still meet my fingers, and despite the age of Stone that binds her more to Meg, she will play Jo's main role.

So shortly after a highly publicized adaptation of Little Women on television, fans of history might have been reluctant to tell this story. However, based on Twitter, it looks like people are very in this possible cast led by Gerwig.

Gerwick & # 39; s Little Women will be the first high-level film adaptation of the book since 1994, starring Winona Ryder in the role of Jo. ICYMI, a modern version of Little Women is also scheduled in the theaters at the end of this year. If you ask me, his selling point seems to be that coach Bolton and Ryan Evans of High School Musical play the role of Mr. March and Laurie (what kind of work?).

Until we see the confirmation of who plays who in this new version of Little Women, I will be busy imagining other potential films that lend themselves to reunion Lady Bird .