‘I’m not that stupid’: Prince Charles won’t ‘meddle’ when he is king | Royal | News

Speaking on the understanding this is the only time he plans to address the subject, the heir to the throne said he will drop his lifelong habit of “meddling” and wading into controversies when he accedes to the throne.

Charles, who turns 70 on November 14, has given a groundbreaking interview to be screened tonight in a BBC One documentary at 9pm to mark his milestone birthday.

He believes that while the Queen remains on the throne, he can continue to speak out but as soon as he becomes King that will all have to change.

He said: “I’m not that stupid. I do realise that it is a separate exercise being sovereign. So of course, you know I understand entirely how that should operate.”

Charles was speaking to a documentary crew who spent the best part of a year following him around to make perhaps the most intimate portrait of a senior member of the Royal Family for half a century.

He said: “You know I’ve tried to make sure whatever I’ve done has been non-party political, but I think its vital to remember there’s only room for one sovereign at a time, not two.

“So, you can’t be the same as the sovereign if you’re the Prince of Wales or the heir.

“But the idea somehow that I am going to go on exactly the same way, if I have to succeed, is nonsense because the two situations are completely different.

“You only have to look at Shakespeare plays, Henry V or Henry IV Part 1 and 2, to see the change that can take place because if you become the sovereign, then you play the role in the way that it is expected.

“So, clearly I won’t be able to do the same things I’ve done you know as heir, so of course you operate within the constitutional parameters. But it’s a different function.”

Charles is the longest-serving heir to the throne in British history but while most people are winding down at 70, he is yet to start the job he has spent his life waiting to do.

However his wife, the Duchess of Cornwall, has insisted that the responsibility does not weigh heavily on him.

She said: “His destiny will come, he’s always known it’s going to and I don’t think it does weigh on his shoulders at all.”

In the past, royal aides have insisted that although Charles would have to change his language and behaviour as monarch, he might continue to use his “convening powers” to bring together politicians, government officials and experts from around the world at, for example, a King’s Conference on global warming.

In tonight’s interview – called Prince, Son and Heir: Charles at 70 – he played down continuing to use his convening powers but did concede it could happen if the Government agreed.

He told the team behind the hour-long documentary: “Well you never know but you could only do it with the agreement of ministers. That’s how it works.”

In fact, he told the documentary’s award-winning film maker John Bridcut that a succession of prime ministers, including Sir Alec Douglas-Home, Sir Harold Wilson and Jim Callaghan had all encouraged him to take a keen interest in politics and public affairs as a young man.

But he admitted officials had been initially against one of his initiatives for deprived young people.

Similar objections in the corridors of power have led to allegations of meddling.

“Really? You don’t say,” he replied, laughing, when it was put to him for the documentary. “But I always wonder what meddling is. I mean I always thought it was motivating, but I’ve always been intrigued.

“If it’s meddling to worry about the inner cities as I did 40 years ago and what was happening or not happening there, the conditions in which people were living, if that’s meddling I’m very proud of it.”

Charles, who has won a reputation for ruffling feathers, suggested each Prince of Wales had to find his own way of doing things.

He said: “Each one of my predecessors had to find out how they would go it, a lot of them dropped dead or were killed before they got very far.

“The Black Prince was the first one and he rushed about doing all the complicated bits and fighting battles while his father sat somewhere else.

“So you know he was busy winning his spurs, and in a sense that’s still what has to happen, I think.”

His elder son and heir, the Duke of Cambridge, has previously suggested that he sees the Queen as more of a role model than his father in his approach to royal duties.

But in an interview for tonight’s programme William said: “There are so many things I admire about my father: his work ethic, his passions, all that side of things.”

——————-

‘Meddling’ is a royal privilege

He has always tried to steer clear of party political disputes, but Prince Charles has racked up a long list of controversies in which he has meddled.

From architecture, to the environment, education, and alternative medicines, Charles has rarely shied away from a fight.

In 1984, he used a speech at the 150th anniversary gala evening of the Royal Institute of British Architects to attack plans for an extension to the National Gallery as a “monstrous carbuncle”.

In 2009, he used his ties to the Qatari royal family to persuade them to drop their chosen scheme for a £3billion redevelopment of Chelsea Barracks in London.

Charles sees part of the role of the Prince of Wales as advising and cautioning ministers and voicing opinions of ordinary people. It is his “black spider memos” to those in power that have prompted repeated allegations of meddling.

Labour’s former Education Secretary Lord Blunkett has claimed the Prince lobbied him and other ministers in Tony Blair’s governments to bring back grammar schools.

He also lobbied ministers to put complementary medicine – homeopathic remedies – on the NHS, although studies had shown they had no health benefits.

In 1999 he sparked a bitter row after publicly questioning the safety of genetically-modified food.