[ad_1]
For the first time, Google is offering a more affordable version of its flagship smartphone. Of course, it's a bit late for this trend. Last year, Apple launched the iPhone XR and, just a few months ago, Samsung had done the same thing with the Galaxy S10e. Naturally, the Google Pixel 3a is compared to the Galaxy S10e, but towards which lighthouse "cheaper" should Android users be interested? Here is a short guide to help you make this decision.
Price
OK, it's probably a bit unfair to compare these two phones only in terms of price or specification. The Samsung Galaxy S10e would be insulted to be called a mid-range phone and the Google Pixel 3a has an unfair advantage with regard to the price. It would be better to consider this as a confrontation between two "more affordable" versions of the flagship products of each company.
As mentioned, the Pixel 3a immediately has an advantage. A $ 400 phone is clearly more affordable than a $ 750 phone, even though it's the least expensive flagship product Samsung can offer. But it's not like an Essential PH-1 or OnePlus against a flagship product. As we will see later, Pixel 3a is a mid-range device designed and designed for hardware.
These price savings are not free. You will miss many features to save hundreds of dollars. This is not a total loss, however, as what some might find to be a disruptive factor may not affect others. It's really a question of balance and control of expectations.
Specifications
You may think that the Galaxy S10e wins the specification race. It would not be far from the truth. After all, the Galaxy S10e is the Galaxy S10 with only a few features removed. Inside, it's pretty much the same monster.
• Operating system: Android 9.0 Pie with Samsung One UI
• CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Samsung Exynos 9820
• RAM: 6 or 8 GB
• Storage room: 128 or 256 GB
• Display: 5.8 inches 2280 × 1080
• Main camera: 12 MP Dual Pixel PDAF, 16 MP
• Secondary camera: 10 MP Dual Pixel PDAF
• Drums: 3,100 mAh
On the other hand, Pixel 3a only has a few details similar to Pixel 3. Fun fact, Pixel 3a is no worse than Pixel 3 in some ways. Of course, it has a slower Snapdragon 670, but they are basically equal in memory. The Pixel 3a also has a larger battery and does not skip the 3.5mm headphone jack.
• Operating system: Android 9.0 Pie (Pure)
• CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• RAM: 4GB
• Storage room: 64 GB
• Display: 5.6 inches 2220 × 1080
• Main camera: 12.2 MP
• Secondary camera: 8 MP
• Drums: 3000 mAh
All things considered, some users might actually feel that both are almost in the running. Why? Because their advantages and disadvantages almost balance. Samsung has the most beefy hardware but all of its software makes it less powerful than ideal. Google has opted for lower specifications, but also maximizes them through software. All games and applications, with the exception of the most intensive resources, will push the Snapdragon 670 beyond its limits. In most cases this would be enough and would even offer better energy efficiency. At least in theory.
In practice, you will sacrifice a lot in Pixel 3a but, as mentioned before, it also depends on the user. The absence of wireless charging is perhaps forgotten, but not having waterproofing can worry some Certainly, the Pixel 3a will do the worst in terms of RAM and fixed data storage.
Design
Design is the place where the two diverge again considerably, although you may not know it at first. Both inherit the design of their more expensive siblings, but only one of them uses almost the same materials. This should no longer surprise anyone right now, but Pixel 3a embraces classic polycarbonate as if it was still fashionable.
Ironically, it could actually play more in favor of Pixel 3a. Plastic is more durable than glass, even though it is also more prone to scratches. iFixit has also shown that the design of Pixel 3a is easier to open and repair. You're also less likely to worry about a $ 400 phone than a $ 750 phone. Assuming all your important data is saved in Google's cloud, of course.
Camera
Nowadays, the competition of smartphones revolves mainly around the cameras. Quite appropriately, it is also there that will take place the second biggest battle between these two. This is perhaps also the second reason why buyers decide to buy one or the other.
You may have heard of reviews of the Galaxy S10 5G camera and the fact that it is only the second on the Huawei P30 Pro. You can conclude that since it shares at least two cameras with the rest of the generation Galaxy S10, its performance would be about the same. This assumes however that the other two sensors have nothing to do with these outstanding performance. This also assumes that the Samsung's camera software for the Galaxy S10e works even the same way as others or that it will elicit the same attention in future updates.
The advantage of Pixel 3a lies in the fact that it only has one camera and that it is exactly the same camera as the one used by Google in the Pixel 3. From more, Google is more likely to endow the Pixel 3a with the same software and artificial intelligence features identical to the ones it offers. the most expensive pixels. Of course, we are talking about Google here, so the guarantee of future updates is, well, guaranteed.
In practice, the first camera releases of Pixel 3a already look promising. There is no doubt that the Galaxy S10 remains in the dust of its Night Sight function. It's really remarkable to see how Google is able to do so much maneuvering with a single low-megapixel camera and a lot of artificial intelligence.
Software
You may think that the camera will be the main subject of contention between these two phones. It's actually only secondary. The real deciding factor will actually be the version of Android that turns on them.
Let's face it. Delete this camera and the pixels might seem almost subnormal compared to other Android headlights. What really sets it apart is the lack of superfluous features and the constant flow of software updates directly from Google. It will be the same pure and virgin experience that the Pixel 3a will offer users. It's really Pixel 3 in a more affordable package.
That said, Android life is not for everyone. Some tend to feel choked by a vanilla experience and find the extra features of truly desirable OEMs. While the experience of Samsung's One UI (formerly TouchWiz) is considered one of the hottest and most personalized, some of them have to find value.
pack
You may think that there is no winner in between and if you consider the different needs of different users, you are partly right. But if you consider what would be the best Android phone with a reduced budget, you will not go wrong with a Google Pixel 3a.
Yes, it will not have all the raw power that the Galaxy S10e would have or the high-end materials, but it far outweighs Samsung's "budget" option. The camera is and will be amazing, thanks to continuous software updates. It will be easier and less expensive to repair if, and not if, accidents happen. It also offers the best Android software experience for those who wish to keep their phone for years, not months.
[ad_2]
Source link