500 plus for the first child not for the farmer



[ad_1]

This year's experience – linked to the loss of the possibility of receiving a benefit of 500 and over related to a sharp increase in farm income calculated by the Central Statistical Office – is apparently not an argument for the Government makes changes, particularly with respect to the calculation of this income.



As we recently wrote, the income of a family entitled to a benefit greater than 500 for the first child is determined on the basis of the "historical" income – for the farmer this year, that is, say for the 2018-2019 payment period, the 2017 income is taken into account. The GUS calculated this income at 3399 PLN. In this case, the loss of agricultural income is not taken into account, for example because of the drought.

Plus: farmers' income up to 500+ without deducting losses after drought?

And apparently nothing will change.

According to Stanisław Szwed, deputy minister of the Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Policy, in response to the parliamentary inquiry, in September 2018, 3,719,000 people were entitled to education benefits. children, including 1,311 thousand in rural communes and 922,000 in urban-rural communes.

It was also calculated that "the total share of children of rural and urban gminas in the total number of children receiving education benefits is 60%", and "among 1,334 thousand families receiving a benefit on the basis of the income criterion, out of 174,000 only. families, the only type of income was that of operating a farm ".

It is still unclear how many children from farm families receive a benefit of 500 and over. It's unclear why 174,000 Farm families already entitled to benefits for the first child, the minister considers that it is a small number and describes it as "only" and not "up & # 39; to." We do not know how many families with income in other professions perceive this benefit for the first child and if this is not a tiny percentage in total. Is it also possible to take advantage of these families without calculating their actual current income?

Plus: Farm families benefited from the "500 plus"?

It is also unclear how many farm families will lose the opportunity to receive an allowance for the first child, even if they lose their income – although their GUS figures show an increase. Nobody counts the real income of a farmer.

To the question of deputies: "How many children in the village can to the 500+ program in 2019, if we take into account the new conversion hectare rates for 2018? Have appropriate simulations been carried out at the Ministry of the Family of Labor and Social Policy and what are the conclusions? "

the Ministry of the Family responded as follows:

"The amount of average income from work on individual farms from 1 hectare converted by the announcement of the President of the Central Statistical Office depends, for a given year, on many factors, including the It should be noted that the reported revenue rate per hectare does not always increase from year to year, and at certain times, due to a variety of factors, the value of income decreased, as in the previous years. 2013-2015 Between 2014 and 2015, revenues of 1 ha decreased by PLN 531.

The increase in revenue recorded in 2017 does not mean a direct impact on program, the family situation could have changed for other reasons, for example: the appearance of another child will result in a lower income per person in the family".

And that's all the MRPiPS have to say about it. Is it a clue for farmers, but how to get a benefit of more than 500 for the first child? Will the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy send such an indication to representatives of other professions?

Therefore, it is not surprising that: "The Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Affairs does not plan to amend the state aid law to raise a child, especially to determine the income of a farm".

So it is interesting to know how much the GUS will calculate the farm income for 2018. Or maybe it's time to think about changes in determining farm income?

Read also:

Farm income not to calculate?


Did you like the article? Share it!

[ad_2]
Source link