[ad_1]
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-5 & # 39;
placement: "Interstitial Gallery 5 Thumbnails",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-10 & # 39;
placement: "Vignettes of Interstitial Gallery 10",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola | | [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-15 & # 39;
placement: "Interstitial Gallery Miniatures 15",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-20 & # 39;
placement: "Interstitial Gallery Thumbnails 20",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window ._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-25 & # 39;
placement: "Thumbnails of Interstitial Gallery 25",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-30 & # 39;
placement: "Interstitial Gallery Vignettes 30",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-33 & # 39;
placement: "Vignettes of interstitial gallery 33",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
It does not appear that other astronauts, like the Apollo 11 mission, will soon land on the Moon.
It does not appear that other astronauts, like the Apollo 11 mission, will dock the moon soon.
Photo: NASA
Astronaut Harrison Schmitt poses in 1972 with Earth in the lunar sky. Schmitt was later an American senator. In 1984, he declared that the nation needed "mission control" to deal with major emergencies such as terrorism.
Astronaut Harrison Schmitt poses in 1972 with Earth in the lunar sky. Schmitt was later an American senator. In 1984, he declared that the nation needed "mission control" to deal with major emergencies such as terrorism.
Photo: EUGENE CERNAN, KRT File
The astronaut Gene Cernan was a member of Apollo 17 in 1972. It is seen here, with the Earth in the background, holding an American flag.
The astronaut Gene Cernan was a member of Apollo 17 in 1972. He is shown here, with the Earth in the background, holding an American flag.
Photo: NASA File
Harrison Jack Schmitt on the moon with the raised tool and the Earth on the rise in the background
Harrison Jack Schmitt on the moon with the raised tool and the Earth on the rise back plan.
Photo: NASA File
Harrison Schmitt discovers an orange floor during a walk on the moon
Harrison Schmitt discovers an orange floor during a walk on the moon.
Photo: NASA File
The Earth Rises on the Moon, Captured from the Lunar Surface with the Cameras of the Apollo 17 Astronauts.
The Earth Rises on the Moon, Captured from the Lunar Surface with the Astronaut's Cameras Apollo 17. [19659047] Photo: NASA file
The Taurus Valley Littrow, landing place of Apollo 17.
The Valley of Taurus Littrow, landing place of Apollo 17.
Photo: NASA File
The lunar lander with Gene Cernan of Apollo 17 and Harrison Jack Schmitt elance from the moon to the command module with astronaut Ron Evans.
The lunar lander with Gene Cernan and Harrison Jack Schmitt of Apollo 17 command module with astronaut Ron Evans.
Photo: NASA File
Geologist Harrison Schmitt collects moon samples for Apollo 17, the last lunar mission in 1972.
Geologist Harrison Schmitt collects moon samples for Apollo 17, the last lunar mission in 1972. [19659046]: NASA File
Astronaut John Young, who was part of the Apollo 16 mission on the moon in April 1972, salutes the American flag after it's been planted on the lunar surface
L & # 39; Astronaut John Young, who was part of the Apollo 16 mission to the moon in April 1972, salutes the American flag after it has been planted on the lunar surface.
Photo: AP File
Part of a composite photo made by Gene Cernan of Apollo 17 in 1972. Harrison Schmitt is on the left
Part of a composite photo directed by Gene Cernan of Apollo 17 in 1972. Harrison Schmitt is on the left.
Photo: NASA, Knopf File
Traces made by extraterrestrials shine under the sunlight in this photo of Alan Shepard during the Apollo 14 lunar mission in 1971.
Traces of extraterrestrial earthlings shine in full sun on this photo of Alan Shepard during the moon Apollo 14 mission in 1971.
Photo: NASA, Knopf File
Astronaut Harrison H. Schmitt works next to a big rock during the third extravehicular activity of Apollo 17 on the moon, December 13, 1972.
The astronaut Harrison H. Schmitt works next to a big rock during the Third Extravehicular Activity of Apollo 17 on the Moon, December 13, 1972.
Photo: AP File
This oblique photograph of the moon usually looks to the northwest in the Sea of Tranquility, projected landing site for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This image was made from the spaceship Apollo 8.
This oblique photograph of the moon usually looks to the northwest in the Sea of Tranquility, projected landing site for Apollo 11 astronauts. This image was made from of the Apollo 8 spacecraft.
Photo: NASA, Associated Press
Astronaut Alan B. Shepard stands with the American flag on the lunar surface in this February 1971 issue photo. Shepard was the first American to fly in space and the fifth human to walk on the moon.
Astronaut Alan B. Shepard stands with the American flag on the lunar surface in this February 1971 file photo. Shepard was the first American to fly in space and the fifth human to walk on the moon.
Photo: AP File
Astronaut Eugene A. Cernan performs a brief check of the lunar vehicle flying at the start of the first Apollo 17 (EVA-1) spacewalk activity at the landing site of Taurus Littrow.
Astronaut Eugene A. Cernan makes a brief check of the Lunar Roving Vehicle at the start of the first Apollo 17 (EVA-1) extravehicular activity at the Taurus Littrow landing site
Photo: Harrison Schmitt, NASA
Astronaut James Irwin salutes an American flag planted on the surface of the moon during the Apollo 15 mission. The lunar module is in the center with Hadley Delta in the background, and the lunar vehicle driven by astronauts wait on the right. less
Astronaut James Irwin salutes an American flag planted on the surface of the moon during the Apollo 15 mission. The lunar module is in the center with Hadley Delta in the background, and the lunar vehicle … more
Photo: AP File
Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. walking on the surface of the moon
Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. walking on the surface of the moon
Photo: NASA, AFP / Getty Images File
On July 21, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin "take a small step for the man" on the Moon.
On July 21, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin "take a small step for the man" & # 39; & # 39; on the moon.
Photo: Chronicle File
Astronaut Edwin E. Aldrin poses for a photo next to the American flag deployed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission on July 20, 1969.
Astronaut Edwin E. Aldrin poses for a photo beside the American flag deployed on the Moon during the Apollo 11 mission on July 20, 1969.
Photo: NEIL ARMSTRONG, AP File
Astronaut James Lovell Jr. was commander of the lunar landing mission of Apollo 13 who developed problems in space, leading to his now famous expression.
The astronaut James Lovell Jr. was the commander of the Apollo 13 lunar landing mission problems in space, leading to his now famous expression.
Photo: NASA
The emergency checklist of the famous landing mission on the Apollo 13 moon of April 1970 is shown. The list was used after the rupture of an oxygen tank on April 13, 1970, which forced the crew to stabilize the spacecraft while saving enough energy and energy. 39, oxygen to survive the return trip. less
The emergency checklist of the famous Apollo 13 lunar landing mission from April 1970 is shown. The list was used after the rupture of an oxygen tank on April 13, 1970, which forced the crew of three men to … more information
[19659103] This view of the severely damaged Apollo 13 service module was photographed from the lunar module / control module after dropping the SM. As seen here, an entire panel on the SM was blown away by the apparent explosion of the second oxygen tank located in Sector 4 of the SM. Two of the tree fuel cells are visible just ahead (above) of the heavily damaged area. minus
This view of the severely damaged Apollo 13 service module was photographed from the lunar module / control module following the release of the SM. As seen here, an entire panel on the SM was swept away by the … more
Photo: NASA
Astronaut Alan Shepard Jr. was monitoring communications between the Apollo 13 spacecraft and the Mission Control Center in this 14 April 1970 photo at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston
The Astronaut Alan Shepard Jr. was monitoring communications between the Apollo 13 spacecraft and the Mission Control Center in this 14 April 1970 photo at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston.
Photo: AP
The directors of Apollo 13 who brought the crippled spaceship back to Earth celebrate Mission Control at the Manned Spacecraft Center, in Houston, when they learn that the control module managed to splash on April 17, 1970 From left to right: Gerald Griffin, Eugene F. Kranz, Glynn S. Lunney and Milton L. Windler. less
The directors of Apollo 13 who brought the crippled spaceship back to Earth are celebrating in Mission Control at the Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, as they learn that the command module has succeeded … more Images
The 1995 film Apollo 13 starring Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon and Bill Paxton, won 2 Oscars and was nominated for several others.
The 1995 film Apollo 13 starring Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon and Bill Paxton won 2 Oscars and was nominated for several others.
Astronauts Explain Why No One Visited The Moon For Over 45 Years – And The Reasons Are Depressing
- The Last Time That A Person The moon was visited in December 1972, when NASA's Apollo 17 mission
- NASA has been planning to send people back to the moon over the decades but has not yet succeeded
- . return to the lunar surface are budgetary and political obstacles – not scientific or technical challenges.
- Private companies like Blue Origin or SpaceX may be the first entities to send people back to the moon.
Landing 12 people on the moon remains one of NASA's greatest achievements, though
The astronauts collected stones, took pictures, conducted experiments, planted flags, and then returned home. But these stays of a week during the Apollo program have not established a lasting human presence on the moon.
More than 45 years after the last landing on the moon crewed – Apollo 17 in December 1972 – there are plenty of reasons to return Researchers and contractors believe that a crewed base on the moon could become a fuel depot for missions in the deep space, lead to the creation of unprecedented space telescopes, facilitate life on Mars, and solve long-standing scientific mysteries on Earth and the creation of the moon. A lunar base could even become a thriving economy, perhaps built around lunar space tourism
"A permanent human research station on the moon is the next logical step, three days away." That's wrong , and not kill everyone, "recently told former astronaut Chris Hadfield at Business Insider." And we have a whole lot of things that we have to invent and then test in order to learn before we start. " to go further. "
But many astronauts and other experts suggest the greatest obstacles to crewed lunar missions over the past four years – the more deceptive if not depressing decades have been. 19659127] It's really expensive to arrive at the moon – but not so expensive
Bloomsbury Auctions
A test and a truth The high cost of a space flight program, in particular for missions involving people, is a significant cost
. A law signed in March 2017 by Donald Trump gives NASA an annual budget of about $ 19.5 billion.
One or the other amount looks like a boon – until you consider that the total is divided between all divisions of the agency and ambitious projects: the telescope James Webb Space, the giant rocket project called Space Launch System and distant missions. the sun, Jupite r, Mars, the asteroid belt, the Kuiper belt and the edge of the solar system. (In contrast, the US military has a budget of about $ 600 billion a year, including a project – the modernization and expansion of the US nuclear arsenal – could cost up to $ 1.7 trillion over 30 years.)
More "NASA's share in the federal budget peaked at 4% in 1965. For 40 years, it has remained below 1 %, and for 15 years "The Apollo 7 astronaut, Walter Cunningham, said during a congressional testimony in 2015.
Trump's budget calls for a return to the Moon , then to an orbital visit on Mars. But given the huge costs and delays of NASA's SLS rocket program, there may not be enough money to reach one or the other destination, even if the International Space Station is quickly disconnected. the moon would cost about $ 104 billion (or $ 133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $ 120 billion dollars today (19659123) "Human exploration is the most expensive space enterprise and, therefore, the most difficult to obtain. political support, "said Cunningham. "Unless the country, which is Congress here, decides to put in more money, it's just what we do here."
Referring to Mars' missions and returning to the moon, Cunningham adds, "NASA's budget is too low to do all the things we've talked about here."
The problem with presidents
Reuters / Carlos Barria
The immediate goal of the Trump administration is to bring astronauts to the "vicinity of the moon" in 2023. That would be towards the end of this which could be Trump's second term if he is re-elected.
And therein lies another major problem: the partisan political lash
"Why would you believe what a president said about a prediction of something that would happen two administrations in the future? " Hadfield said. "It's just a conversation."
From the point of view of astronauts, it is the mission. The process of designing, engineering and testing a spaceship that could allow people to access another world lasts much longer than a president. two terms. But there is a predictable trend of incoming presidents and legislators who cancel the space leader's previous space exploration priorities.
-
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: & # 39; taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-5-113678 & # 39;
placement: "Vignettes of the interstitial gallery 5 113678",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: 'taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-10-113678',
placement: "Vignettes of Interstitial Gallery 10 113678",
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
-
-
-
-
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];
_taboola.push ({
fashion: & # 39; thumbnails -c & # 39;
container: "taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-14-113678",
placement: Interstitial Gallery Miniatures 14 113678,
target_type: mix & # 39;
});
_taboola.push ({flush: true});
Photo: Buzz Aldrin via Instagram
10 Things to Know About NASA's Plan to Go on the Moon, March
10 Things to Know About NASA's Plan to Go on the Moon , March
Photo: Buzz Aldrin Via Instagram
Image 2 by 14
|
Return to the moon
10 things to know about NASA's plan for the Moon Mars
The new engineering analysis, presented by Apollo luminaries such as astronaut Buzz Aldrin and the Flight director Chris Kraft, suggests that the agency could put humans on the moon in 2021 for about $ 10 billion, and establish a permanent presence later this decade.
less
10 Things to Know About NASA's Plan on the Moon, March
The New Engineering Analysis, touted by Apollo luminaries such that astronaut Buzz Aldrin and flight director Chris Kraft, suggests agency
… more
Photo: Buzz Aldrin On Instagram
Image 3 by 14
|
The rocket of NASA
In contrast, NASA's current plans to use its own much more expensive vehicles would only allow the space agency to fly around the moon in the mid-2020s.
By cons , NASA plans to use its own much more expensive means the vehicles would only allow the space agency to fly around the moon in the mid-2020s.
Photo: Smiley N. Pool, Houston Chronicle
Image 4 by 14
|
March in 2030
NASA claims that by building its own large rocket, the Space Launch System, it paves the way for a Mars landing of its astronauts in the 2030s.
NASA states that By building his own large rocket, the Space Launch System, he sets the stage for a Mars landing by his astronauts in the 2030s.
Photo: NASA / MSFC
Image 6 by 14
|
Unrealistic goals
However, given NASA's existing budget, several independent analyzes concluded that the agency's current March plans are unrealistic. A particularly influential report from the National Research Commission, published in 2014, also suggested that it was a mistake not to consider the moon as a stepping stone to Mars. minus
However, given NASA's existing budget, several independent analyzes have concluded that the current March plans of the agency are unrealistic. A particularly influential report of the National Commission of … more
Photo: HO, Handout
Image 7 by 14
|
Deep space
The new study, independently reviewed by former space chief NASA, Joe Rothenberg, and other experts, does just that. It offers a potentially much less expensive and sustainable path to deep space, while nurturing America's thriving commercial space industry. moins
La nouvelle étude, revue indépendamment par l'ancien chef de la NASA, le vol spatial habité Joe Rothenberg et d'autres experts, fait justement cela. Il offre une voie potentiellement beaucoup moins chère et durable pour … plus
Photo: NASA
Image 8 de 14
|
Fusées privées
Les plans prévoient que les fusées SpaceX et United Launch Alliance enverront d'abord des éclaireurs robotiques et des prospecteurs sur la lune plus tard dans la décennie, des atterrissages humains dans des vaisseaux spatiaux privés dans les années 2020 et le développement de systèmes pour extraire la glace des pôles. dans l'hydrogène et l'oxygène. less
Les plans prévoient que les fusées SpaceX et United Launch Alliance enverront d'abord des éclaireurs robotiques et des prospecteurs sur la Lune plus tard dans la décennie, des atterrissages humains dans des vaisseaux spatiaux privés dans les années 2020 et le … plus
19659171] 9 de 14
|
Coût élevé du carburant
L'exploration du système solaire coûterait beaucoup moins cher si la NASA n'avait pas à transporter tout son carburant du sol. Il en coûte 10 000 $ ou plus pour soulever une livre de propergol de la Terre. Et envoyer des humains et tout ce dont ils ont besoin pour survivre sur Mars nécessitera des centaines de tonnes de carburant. moins
L'exploration du système solaire serait beaucoup moins coûteuse si la NASA n'avait pas à transporter tout son carburant du sol. Il en coûte 10 000 $ ou plus pour soulever une livre de propergol de la Terre. Et pour envoyer … plus
Photo: Red Huber, Nouvelles de McClatchy-Tribune
Image 11 de 14
|
Base de la lune
La nouvelle étude conclut que l'établissement d'une station de quatre personnes à un pôle lunaire pourrait permettre la production de 200 tonnes d'eau par an au début des années 2030. Cela pourrait transformer la lune en une sorte de station-service pour fournir du carburant bon marché aux missions de la NASA vers Mars ou ailleurs plus profondément dans le système solaire. less
La nouvelle étude conclut que l'établissement d'une station de quatre personnes à un pôle lunaire pourrait permettre la production de 200 tonnes d'eau par an au début des années 2030. Cela pourrait transformer la lune en une station-service de … plus
Photo: Neil A. Armstrong, HOGP
La NASA consacre moins d'un quart de son budget à l'exploration spatiale profonde, dépensant 3 à 4 milliards de dollars par an pour le développement de la fusée Space Launch System, du satellite Orion et des rampes de lancement qu'elle compte utiliser pour survoler l'orbite basse. le milieu des années 2020. moins
La NASA consacre moins d'un quart de son budget à l'exploration spatiale profonde, dépensant 3 à 4 milliards de dollars par an pour le développement de la fusée Space Launch System, de l'engin spatial Orion et des … plus
: Smiley N. Pool, Houston Chronicle
Image 13 de 14
|
Priorités du Congrès
La nouvelle analyse a déterminé qu'à l'intérieur de ce coin budgétaire, la NASA pourrait à la place développer une colonie humaine sur la Lune avec des roquettes privées beaucoup moins chères. Le Congrès, cependant, soutient les efforts de la NASA pour construire la grande fusée Space Launch System et les emplois qu'elle fournit dans de nombreux états. moins
La nouvelle analyse a déterminé que, dans le cadre de ce coin budgétaire, la NASA pourrait plutôt développer un établissement humain sur la lune avec des roquettes privées beaucoup moins chères. Le Congrès, cependant, soutient les efforts de la NASA pour construire le … plus
Photo: NASA
10 choses à savoir sur le plan de la NASA aller sur la lune, Mars
"Je voudrais que le prochain président soutienne un budget qui nous permette d'accomplir la mission qu'on nous demande d'accomplir, quelle que soit cette mission », a écrit l'astronaute Scott Kelly, qui a passé une année dans l'espace, lors d'une session de Reddit Ask Me Anything en janvier 2016 (avant que Trump ne prenne ses fonctions)
Mais les présidents et le Congrès ne semblent pas se soucier de maintenir le cap. 19659125] En 2004, par exemple, l'administration Bush a chargé la NASA de trouver un moyen de remplacer la navette spatiale, qui devait prendre sa retraite, et de retourner sur la Lune. The agency came up with the Constellation program to land astronauts on the moon, using a rocket called Ares and a spaceship called Orion.
NASA spent $9 billion over five years designing, building, and testing hardware for that human spaceflight program. Yet after President Barack Obama took office — and the Government Accountability Office released a report about NASA's inability to estimate Constellation's cost — Obama pushed to scrap the program and signed off on the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket instead.
Trump hasn't scrapped SLS. But he did change Obama's goal of launching astronauts to an asteroid to moon and Mars missions.
Such frequent changes to NASA's expensive priorities has led to cancellation after cancellation, a loss of about $20 billion, and years of wasted time and momentum.
"I'm disappointed that they're so slow and trying to do something else," Apollo 8 astronaut Jim Lovell told Business Insider in 2017. "I'm not excited about anything in the near future. I'll just see things as they come."
Buzz Aldrin said in a 2015 testimony to Congress that he believes the will to return to the moon must come from Capitol Hill.
"American leadership is inspiring the world by consistently doing what no other nation is capable of doing. We demonstrated that for a brief time 45 years ago. I do not believe we have done it since," Aldrin wrote in a prepared statement. "I believe it begins with a bi-partisan Congressional and Administration commitment to sustained leadership."
The real driving force behind that government commitment to return to the moon is the will of the American people, who vote for politicians and help shape their policy priorities. But public interest in lunar exploration has always been lukewarm.
Even at the height of the Apollo program — after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped onto the lunar surface — only 53% of Americans thought the program was worth the cost. Most of the rest of the time, US approval of Apollo hovered significantly below 50%.
Today, 55% of Americans think NASA should make returning to the moon a priority, though only a quarter of those believers think it should be a top priority, according to a Pew Research Center poll released in June. But 44% of people surveyed by the poll think sending astronauts back to the moon shouldn't be done at all.
Support for crewed Mars exploration is stronger, with 63% believing it should be a NASA priority, and 91% of people think scanning the skies for killer asteroids is important.
The challenges beyond politics
NASA
The political tug-of-war over NASA's mission and budget isn't the only reason people haven't returned to the moon. The moon is also a 4.5-billion-year-old death trap for humans, and must not be trifled with or underestimated.
Its surface is littered with craters and boulders that threaten safe landings. Leading up to the first moon landing in 1969, the US government spent what would be billions in today's dollars to develop, launch, and deliver satellites to the moon to could map its surface and help mission planners scout for possible Apollo landing sites.
But a bigger worry is what eons of meteorite impacts has created: regolith, also called moon dust.
Madhu Thangavelu, an aeronautical engineer at the University of Southern California, wrote in 2014 that the moon is covered in "a fine, talc-like top layer of lunar dust, several inches deep in some regions, which is electro-statically charged through interaction with the solar wind and is very abrasive and clingy, fouling up spacesuits, vehicles and systems very quickly."
Peggy Whitson, an astronaut who lived in space for a total of 665 days, recently told Business Insider that the Apollo missions "had a lot of problems with dust."
"If we're going to spend long durations and build permanent habitat s, we have to figure out how to handle that," Whitson said.
There's also a problem with sunlight. For 14.75 days at a time, the lunar surface is a boiling hellscape that is exposed directly to the sun's harsh rays — the moon has no protective atmosphere. The next 14.75 days are in total darkness, making the moon's surface one of the coldest places in the universe.
A small nuclear reactor being developed by NASA, called Kilopower, could supply astronauts with electricity during weeks-long lunar nights — and would be useful on other worlds, including Mars.
"There is not a more environmentally unforgiving or harsher place to live than the moon," Thangavelu wrote. "And yet, since it is so close to the Earth, there is not a better place to learn how to live, away from planet Earth."
NASA has designed dust- and sun-resistant spacesuits and rovers, though it's uncertain if that equipment is anywhere near ready to launch, as some of it was part of the now-canceled Constellation program.
A generation of billionaire 'space nuts' may get there
SpaceX/YouTube
A suite of moon-capable rockets is on the horizon.
"There's this generation of billionaires who are space nuts, which is great," astronaut Jeffrey Hoffman told journalists during a roundtable earlier this year. "The innovation that's been going on over the last 10 years in spaceflight never would've happened if it was just NASA and Boeing and Lockheed. Because there was no motivation to reduce the cost or change the way we do it."
Hoffman is referring to the work by Elon Musk and his rocket company, SpaceX, as well as that of Jeff Bezos, who runs a secretive aerospace company called Blue Origin.
"There's no question — if we're going to go farther, especially if we're going to go farther than the moon — we need new transportation," Hoffman added. "Right now we're still in the horse-and-buggy days of spaceflight."
Many astronauts' desire to return to the moon fits into Bezos' long-term vision. Bezos has floated a plan around Washington to start building the first moon base using Blue Origin's upcoming New Glenn rocket system. In April, he said, "we will move all heavy industry off of Earth, and Earth will be zoned residential and light industry."
Musk has also spoken at length about how SpaceX's in-development "Big Falcon Rocket" could pave the way for affordable, regular lunar visits. SpaceX might even visit the moon before NASA or Blue Origin. The company's new Falcon Heavy rocket is capable of launching a small Crew Dragon space capsule past the moon and back to Earth — and Musk has said two private citizens have already paid a large deposit to go on the voyage.
"My dream would be that, some day, the moon would become part of the economic sphere of the Earth — just like geostationary orbit and low-Earth orbit," Hoffman said. "Space out as far as geostationary orbit is part of our everyday economy. Some day I think the moon will be, and that's something to work for."
Astronauts don't doubt we'll get back to the moon, and on to Mars. It's just a matter of when.
"I guess eventually, things will come to pass where they will go back to the moon and eventually go to Mars, probably not in my lifetime," Lovell said. "Hopefully they'll be successful."
Correction: A previous version of this story used an incorrect number of moonwalkers. During NASA's Apollo program, 12 people landed on the moon, not 14 people. We regret this astronomical error.
Join the conversation about this story »
NOW WATCH: Here’s what NASA could accomplish if it had the US military’s $600 billion budget
See Also:
SEE ALSO: 27 of the most iconic, jaw-dropping photos of the Earth and the moon from space
DON'T MISS: The space between Earth and the moon is mind-boggling. This graphic reveals just how big it is — and what's out there.
[ad_2]
Source link