Astronauts explain why no one has visited the moon for over 45 years – and the reasons are depressing



[ad_1]

  • The Last Time That A Person The moon was visited in December 1972, when NASA's Apollo 17 mission
  • NASA has been planning to send people back to the moon over the decades but has not yet succeeded
  • . return to the lunar surface are budgetary and political obstacles – not scientific or technical challenges.
  • Private companies like Blue Origin or SpaceX may be the first entities to send people back to the moon.

Landing 12 people on the moon remains one of NASA's greatest achievements, though

The astronauts collected stones, took pictures, conducted experiments, planted flags, and then returned home. But these stays of a week during the Apollo program have not established a lasting human presence on the moon.

More than 45 years after the last landing on the moon crewed – Apollo 17 in December 1972 – there are plenty of reasons to return Researchers and contractors believe that a crewed base on the moon could become a fuel depot for missions in the deep space, lead to the creation of unprecedented space telescopes, facilitate life on Mars, and solve long-standing scientific mysteries on Earth and the creation of the moon. A lunar base could even become a thriving economy, perhaps built around lunar space tourism

"A permanent human research station on the moon is the next logical step, three days away." That's wrong , and not kill everyone, "recently told former astronaut Chris Hadfield at Business Insider." And we have a whole lot of things that we have to invent and then test in order to learn before we start. " to go further. "

But many astronauts and other experts suggest the greatest obstacles to crewed lunar missions over the past four years – the more deceptive if not depressing decades have been. 19659127] It's really expensive to arrive at the moon – but not so expensive

  Saturn V rocket at dawn 1967 Bloomsbury Auctions

A test and a truth The high cost of a space flight program, in particular for missions involving people, is a significant cost

. A law signed in March 2017 by Donald Trump gives NASA an annual budget of about $ 19.5 billion.

One or the other amount looks like a boon – until you consider that the total is divided between all divisions of the agency and ambitious projects: the telescope James Webb Space, the giant rocket project called Space Launch System and distant missions. the sun, Jupite r, Mars, the asteroid belt, the Kuiper belt and the edge of the solar system. (In contrast, the US military has a budget of about $ 600 billion a year, including a project – the modernization and expansion of the US nuclear arsenal – could cost up to $ 1.7 trillion over 30 years.)

More "NASA's share in the federal budget peaked at 4% in 1965. For 40 years, it has remained below 1 %, and for 15 years "The Apollo 7 astronaut, Walter Cunningham, said during a congressional testimony in 2015.

Trump's budget calls for a return to the Moon , then to an orbital visit on Mars. But given the huge costs and delays of NASA's SLS rocket program, there may not be enough money to reach one or the other destination, even if the International Space Station is quickly disconnected. the moon would cost about $ 104 billion (or $ 133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $ 120 billion dollars today (19659123) "Human exploration is the most expensive space enterprise and, therefore, the most difficult to obtain. political support, "said Cunningham. "Unless the country, which is Congress here, decides to put in more money, it's just what we do here."

Referring to Mars' missions and returning to the moon, Cunningham adds, "NASA's budget is too low to do all the things we've talked about here."

The problem with presidents

  Trump astronaut Reuters / Carlos Barria

The immediate goal of the Trump administration is to bring astronauts to the "vicinity of the moon" in 2023. That would be towards the end of this which could be Trump's second term if he is re-elected.

And therein lies another major problem: the partisan political lash

"Why would you believe what a president said about a prediction of something that would happen two administrations in the future? " Hadfield said. "It's just a conversation."

From the point of view of astronauts, it is the mission. The process of designing, engineering and testing a spaceship that could allow people to access another world lasts much longer than a president. two terms. But there is a predictable trend of incoming presidents and legislators who cancel the space leader's previous space exploration priorities.


[ad_2]
Source link