Celebry Maleńczuk was plunged. The interview that he gave, the evidence of the accusation before him ?!

After the prosecutor has sued the activist, the prosecution is joined in the case. The trial is therefore based on criminal prosecution.

The case concerns the events of December 17 on the Main Market Square in Krakow. The Ensemble party organized a demonstration against the government's withdrawal of the anti-violence convention. Representatives of the Committee for the Defense of Democracy took part in the demonstration to express their solidarity with the opposition occupying the plenary hall of the Sejm.

Not far from the anti-abortion demonstration organized by the Pro – Right to Life Foundation. Five people took part.

"During picketing I was attacked by Maciej Maleńczuk. At first he shouted after me and other volunteers, then he came to me, tore off my banner and threw me to the ground. He solved my protest by striking my left fist with my fist. "

– reported the event on the Stopaborcji.pl voluntary website of the Pro Foundation – Right to life. Prosecutions against him were prepared by lawyers from the foundation of the Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture. As pointed out in the indictment, "The musician has boasted of the attack on the social networking site, which proves that he is not following the law."

Maciej Maleńczuk did not plead guilty. As he explained in court, he went to the marketplace to protest the events in the Sejm. After a while, he realized that "huge ugly images of torn human corpses" were displayed next to them. "It was Saturday, at 1 pm, women were walking around the market square with young children, everyone was turning away from such disgusting images presented in public. These posters have woken me up and I decided to intervene, "Maleńczuk explained.

"I did not speak directly (volunteer), if I remember correctly, I did not use blasphemy," he said. During his reporting, he asked what this event had to do with the events of the Sejm, and the volunteer turned to him in vulgar terms "s … ch …". In response to this musician took out his banner, and when the activist headed in his direction, he pushed him back. The musician also denied having commented on the event on the social networking site and indicated that there were several fake accounts in addition to his official account.

In turn, the pro-life activist testified in court that because of the noise, he had tried to shout at the music and answer his questions, but he had grabbed his banner and s & # 39; He was struck on the left side of the jaw. As a result of the impact, there was swelling of the oral cavity from the inside and removal of the tooth. After 10 days of private prosecution, he did not prepare medical or photographic documentation because he feared the mother's reaction that "would be furious that he is participating in such events".

During the hearing, during which journalists could not record images or sounds, The court admitted into evidence the interview of Maleńczuk, given to the host of the show "Two Worlds" on October 24 this year. In the reconstructed fragment, the musician said: "I had it (profile on Facebook), but that ended with a court, it was too hot and I found myself in the room. hearing. " "Not for Facebook, but for what I wrote there" – Maleńczuk added in an interview.

According to the representative of private prosecutor Maciej Kryczek, who filed the request for evidence, in the passage indicated, Malczuk confessed to the act that was blamed on him.

The defendant from Maleńczuk, lawyer Marta Lech, protested against such evidence, stressing that such findings "are not part of the criminal procedure", and even if an admission of guilt is admitted, it can only be A "creative element" in social media and should in no way be treated equally with the explanations given by the accused in court. Guy. Lech believed that the procedures thus conducted were limited to determining "who wrote the most about who," and pointed out that media publications did not help to establish the facts.

The music advocate also recalled that the injured party – he admitted himself – met with several profiles of Maleńczuk on the Internet and independently assessed cases of forgery. As she added, her client's unapproved accounts are in virtual space until today.

"Nothing can replace what anyone explains (in court)," Lech told reporters after the hearing. "Just as Maciej Maleńczuk rightly said in this interview, there is no story from which a promotion can not be made today." What is the problem today? For me, this is for me the basis from the beginning to promote myself in this process "- She stressed and added that her client will certainly refer to this evidence.

According to information given after Lech's proxy, Maleńczuk mentioned in a given interview a completely different situation: it was the suppression by Facebook due to the publication of the indisputable content of his actual profile.

During the hearing, the court announced that it would ask for the third time the administration of Facebook in the United States to determine whether the profile on which appeared the entry, in which, as attended by Lech, Maleńczuk had to call to "carry the picket". he belonged to music.

According to Lech, the difficulty in getting this information is due to the fact that "freedom of speech is guaranteed in the United States, and if someone's a frank one on Facebook, there is not any." problem ", but" here is something else ". "The court has turned to Facebook twice and Facebook has refused, but maybe they do not know that the case is not about defamation, defamation, but only the inviolability body " – she said.

Before starting the process in this case last May. a conciliation meeting was held in court, but no reconciliation took place. Prosecutors presented high financial claims to Maleńczuk. "At the conciliation meeting, the objectives of this procedure were clearly defined: in my opinion, the organization that represents the activist is guided by mercenary motivations," said Ms. Lech.

The lawsuit for public contempt brought by Maleńczuk against the same activist, has been completed for this purpose. The experts concluded that the activist was suffering from an illness in which, at the time of the incident, he did not recognize the scope of his act and could not handle his behavior. On this basis, the court had to terminate the proceedings.

The next hearing date was March 21, 2019.