Detained after the demonstrations in front of the Sejm, he went to the hospital



[ad_1]

A protest against the changes in the Supreme Court took place on Friday in the Sejm. The police arrested four people. Two of them after the police intervention went to the hospital.

Protest under the Diet at the Supreme Court

On a film made available by citizens of the Republic of Poland, we can see how a group of policemen extract a crowd of young men and drive a man, an officer holds a man behind I sew, after a grimace one can conclude that he is causing him pain. That's Dawid Winiarski.

Winiarski went to the hospital at ul. Lindley. On the film made available through the eye.press portal, one can see how the reporter tries to enter the hospital room, where he is stuck in an orthopedic collar. Initially, the police make the conversation difficult. – This is a detained person – says the officer.

"Furrows all over the body, poking pain under the belly"

Finally, I manage to speak. From the film's signature on the oko.press page, we learn that this part of the film was recorded by Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus, a member of parliament who "was looking for David's desperate mother in Warsaw hospitals."

Winiarski tells the story that is wrong with him? The video is assembled, the first part of the expression is broken. – (…) first on the wall, then on the second wall, then on the floor. They gave me three times a lever, so I do not know what happened with the elbow. The furrows are all over my body and I have a stinging pain under the belly – he says and adds that there was no fracture and no medication. There are red marks on the body of the man.

According to numerous accounts, Winiarski had no contact with his family or his lawyer for several hours. That he was "wanted". Such information is provided, among others, oko.press and citizens of the Republic of Poland. "Dawid Winiarski was found at the hospital after many hours of research." The police refused to provide information on his place of detention, thus preventing the detainee from having access to a lawyer, unfortunately it is an illegal practice. "19659009] Winiarski also had to demonstrate peacefully, which undermines some of the commentators, causing him to lose responsibility

Police: No complaints

Police Headquarters comments on detention – There were no complaints Police officers have taken decisive action against the detained person in connection with the violation of the inviolability of a public official – informs in an interview with Gazeta.pl, the spokesman of the KSP

According to the police, Winiarski contacted his lawyer – In any situation, any request a contact with a lawyer, such information goes to his lawyer – he explains – Remind- you that we are dealing with an inmate t that not everyone can be admitted to an inmate – he says

– Even the family? – we ask.

– This is a detained person, contact is only possible with a lawyer. We can only provide information to the family about the detainee – explains Marczuk

Defendant Winecki: Complaint about the legality of detention

Defender Dawid Winiarski, lawyer Jarosław Kaczyński, describes that contact was difficult, but only for a moment. – We can not say that there would be a big damnation of the police here. As soon as I asked for a contact and the opportunity to go to the hospital, to Mr Winiarski, you were a policeman who did not know it himself, he got this information. We met 2.30. To say that the police did not want to give us information is an abuse – explains Kaczyński and points out that he and other supporters have had the opportunity to contact each of the detainees.

Boss informs that There will be complaints about the detention. What exactly? – In the same way as detention, but probably also on the regularity and legality of detention. A notification will also be made about the possibility of committing a crime by police, in the form of exceeding powers – says Jarosław Kaczyński. At present, the lawyer prefers not to disclose the details regarding the actions of the police.

"I have the time and the will, but as for the law, I can read. It is thus that the jury chose the judgment of the Supreme Court

[ad_2]
Source link