[ad_1]
Mr. Dworczyk was asked on TVN24 on Tuesday why, in his opinion, the EC officials had not yet been convinced of the reform of the justice system in Poland.
"The problem is that to make a compromise, To convince anyone, it takes good will from the other side The last months and the many interviews conducted by Prime Minister Morawiecki, whether with the President of the EC or with Commissioner Timm, conclude that the Commission is not interested in a genuine dialogue.Some of the (EU) officials do not work in the dictionary, "answered Dworczyk .
He felt that "more and more European politicians understand the essence of the changes taking place in Poland". Asked what would happen if the Court of Justice of the European Union challenged the Supreme Court law and rejected the changes, Dworczyk pointed out that there were "more than 1300 cases at the same stage as Poland . "
"I do not think) issued a decision in this case" – said Dworczyk. "We adhere to European law, the Bialowieza forest is a good example," he added
.The European Commission announced in early July the opening of an infringement procedure and sent a letter of formal notice to Poland. There are provisions regarding the transition of Supreme Court justices to rest. Warsaw authorities have one month to respond to this call from the European Commission
The EC can – and this often happens – initiate a procedure of violation of European law if it considers that there is a violation of Community law in a given country. or a complaint will be filed in respect of the violation.
The offense procedure has three stages: the first is to remove the violation, the second is to give countries time to change, and the EC can sue the country in court.
According to the EC in the case concerning the Supreme Court, there is no criterion in the Polish regulations that the President is expected to follow when he decides to agree to extend the position of Judge SN. Moreover – according to the EC – there is no possibility of judicial review of such a decision. The Commission is of the opinion that this violates the principle of the independence of the judiciary, including the irremovability of judges, and that Poland is not fulfilling its obligations under certain provisions of the EU Treaty and of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. in force on 3 April, three months after that date, on 3 July, SN judges over the age of 65 are governed by law. They may continue to perform their duties if in the month following the entry into force of the new Act, that is until May 2, they made an appropriate declaration and submitted appropriate medical certificates, and the Polish President agrees to continue to hold the position of SN Judge. There are currently 74 Supreme Court justices, 27 of whom are of this age. (PAP)
author: Wiktoria Nicałek
[ad_2]
Source link
