[ad_1]
In the documentation of the Android Q system, a reference to the "deep pressure" of the system interface was found in the same way as we do in some iPhones. Google can finally convince developers of 3D Touch copy applications.
The actual value of the 3D Touch interface in iOS is a questionable one. Even Apple still seems to have doubts about him, he still has not appeared in many to touch products, despite their refreshment. However, it is undoubtedly a very innovative and interesting idea.
3D Touch recognizes a different pressure force on the touch screen. And that means software developers can create the right answers at different levels of support. For example, a light touch is a preview of the folder and you tap it to open it.
Only Apple has succeeded in this idea.
It is not Apple who introduced the phone with the 3D Touch interface. Huawei, probably inspired by the media rumors of the Apple camp, has managed to market the Mate S phone faster than Apple's iPhone 6s. However, as everyone was waiting for it, the Apple hardware aroused the interest of programmers alone. On Mate S, no 3D Touch app was created without Huaweia's grant.
The strength of the iPhone brand, developed over the years, is not the only asset of Apple on Huawe. Only Apple could guarantee programmers that their application would be 100% compatible with 3D Touch. iOS devices. interface 3D Touch apps with Mate S will not work on any other Android phone. In this one using a similar innovation in the interface.
Phone manufacturers have long been more innovative than Google. Only, none of this can happen.
Looking at the innovations introduced in later versions of Android, one has the impression that Google examines the EMUI and Samsung Experience systems, chooses the best ideas from its partners and implements them in the following way. official Android version. Android phone manufacturers have long regarded Apple as their only competitor, also competing fiercely. This boosts investment in innovation at a rate that keeps even Google from being a possible partner. There is no time for that.
However, sooner or later, a cooperation with Google is necessary, as evidenced by the case of Mate S. Nobody wanted to create applications for him, because nobody cared about the size of the market represented by the number of 39 copies sold for this model phone. The situation may seem different if we talk about the entire generation of devices from different manufacturers.
This perfectly illustrates how much Apple's competition is tied.
Only Android Q must introduce a seamless mechanism to manipulate 3D Touch … if at all Google does not give up during beta testing. This Android Q will go to most new phones on sale a year after launch. Huawei Mate S appeared on the market at the end of 2015. Half a decade late.
It is not said that 3D Touch on Android phones is a great idea or important. The future will check its validity in the context of competition for the iPhone. However, this is not serious. The essence is the fact that we will only see it in a while. It is definitely too late and much too long since the creation of the first phone of this type.
This anchor, which is addressed to manufacturers of Google Android phones, is an extremely interesting case. Let's agree, without Google, these phone makers are nothing. They are not able to offer services in Maps, YouTube, Reading, Search or Gmail … or they keep it in an absurdly strict secret. But also by Google, they can not follow the many problems of Apple. They can create any innovation, provided that its use is not assumed by developers of external applications.
Google's power is not all-powerful. What can begin to convince slowly.
Some hardware manufacturers decide to screw up the inertia of the relationship with Google and create their own services to be able to implement their innovations in their products. These attempts do not always succeed – Bixby is probably the most humiliated AI of all time. But Samsung Health from the same company is also a service I prefer to Google Fit. Mainly thanks to the innovations of Samsung.
For me, the Samsung Galaxy Watch is faster, more convenient, more functional and more convenient than anything I know and uses the Google platform. Samsung Health has its client application for Android, so everything works as expected. I have an Android phone and, therefore, the necessary Google services in the most convenient form. But I do not use Google Fit, even though I have a smart watch.
Not everyone will agree with my flattering opinion about Samsung's electronic clothing, but there is also a Huawei Watch GT that has received a warm welcome, associated with Huawei Health. These are just examples that will come, not just in this category of products. Google could eventually find itself in a situation with which an experienced colleague recently had to struggle, Microsoft. So with the need to evaluate which services it is always a good idea to maintain and which ones … do not do it.
I think we all know why it's good to get rid of ballast.
The more Google takes care of services, the further the development of Android is slow. After all, the novelties of the system must be adapted to these services, where each of them is updated at its own pace by its creators. The constant disasters of Pixel hardware and various Android ranges prove that Google and its hardware partners are doomed. Maybe it's time to stop competing?
Microsoft got rid of the Groove music service and concluded that it was not able to cope with its competitors, including those using its platform. For the same reason, the development of the Web EdgeHTML engine has been stopped or it is slowly leaving the Cortana market. To get rid of the ballast, it's hard to beat the competition.
Apple still has a huge advantage in the context of the pace of innovation as the only hardware vendor for its operational software. I would like Google to focus on the services for which it is one of the leaders. I would like Android to become even more flexible so we do not have to laugh about introducing 3D Touch into Android Q. Because I see how Google's partners can be innovative. And how many times, even because of Google, is not so much.
[ad_2]
Source link
