Hughes explains why the result 7: 0 is not valid for Kubica



[ad_1]

Seven races are enough to draw definitive conclusions about the individual performance of the drivers in their teams. Dry statistics often do not tell the whole truth.

It's no secret that since the beginning of the season, Robert Kubica has serious problems to "hear" with his car. The Pole admits he is trying his best, but the effects of his work are often barely perceptible due to the huge crisis his team is going through.

In addition to Lance Strolla, the Pole is one of the drivers of the race. After seven races to zero, he loses with his partner in the rivalry in qualifying. Daniel Ricciardo (Renault), Pierre Gasly (Red Bull) and Charles Leclerc (Ferrari) get better performances in this comparison, which managed to dominate the team partner only once. .

"There is some ambiguity about Russell's dominance over Kubica, mainly because Williams is struggling to provide two chassis with similar performances," Hughes wrote. "But that should not be a good thing for Russell, who gets out of the way, but the first four races of the season between Williams cars were really different." When they were changed during sessions from training or testing in Bahrain, the same car was faster no matter what drove them. "

"This difference should disappear after the team has prepared a new chassis for Barcelona, ​​but Kubica still reports some anomalies." In Monaco, Kubica usually had an advantage over his partner, he was faster in passing until his last start in Q1, where he met a lap on the outside. "

"In Montreal, Russell was faster to an unprecedented degree [0,8 sekundy] while Kubica had more and more objections to the behavior of his car. The verdict on Kubica's return has still not been resolved. "

[ad_2]
Source link