[ad_1]
The decision to extradite Dotcom now belongs to New Zealand Justice Minister Andrew Little, but Dotcom said it would seek permission from Appealing Thursday's decision in New York.
With three co-defendants, Dotcom was indicted by a US grand jury on various charges, including racketeering conspiracy, cable fraud, conspiracy for infringement of copyright on a commercial scale and money laundering.
They deny the charges and fiercely fight against extradition, arguing that Megaupload was simply a sit-in. e of file sharing and that they should not be blamed for what others had downloaded there.
Three New Zealand courts have now ruled against them, rejecting this argument and claiming that they could not be extradited for taking advantage of the copyright infringement because it did not happen. was not a crime in New Zealand.
Although the Court of Appeal held that dual criminality was required for an extradition offense, it stated that "we are satisfied that the New Zealand law allows extradition for violation of the copyright in the circumstances of the case ".
"The appellants are charged with conduct which, if proven, would establish extradition offenses under New Zealand law," the court said.
Last Chance
"We have now gone before three courts each having a different legal analysis – one of them thought that there was no copyright infringement" , he said. "We will seek reconsideration from the New Zealand Supreme Court."
He said that the judgment of the Court of Appeal was "in total negation of the legislative history and the intent of the Copyright Act, so it the value of toilet paper.
"The series of precedents is worrying and has ramifications in New Zealand apart from my case," Dotcom added. "The decision exposes Internet service providers to criminal liability for the misuse of their services by users, as is claimed against me."
CNN's Jethro Mullen contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
