[ad_1]
While Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's visit to North Korea on Friday and Saturday was designed to allay concerns over denuclearization talks between Washington and Pyongyang, it seems to have failed.
Hours after Pompeo's departure The North Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a scathing statement that put the whole company in doubt.
"The United States only came into existence with their unilateral demand for" denuclearization. "He added that the American attitude towards the talks had been" regrettable. "[19659004] But North Korea's own statement was notable for far more than its negative tone.Through more than 1,200 words in an official English translation broadcast by the central news agency Korea Central News Agency, she could offer the most comprehensive signal of how Pyongyang is considering the possibility of abandoning its nuclear weapons.
[North Korea calls U.S. attitude toward talks ‘gangster-like’ and ‘cancerous,’ rejecting Pompeo’s assessment]
shocked North Korea-observers, who say that Pyongyang has been largely consistent on the nuclear issue over the years But he may surprise those who heard President Trump when he declared that there was no longer any nuclear threat from North Korea the day after his meeting with the North Korean leader. Kim Jong Un for the first time.
Pyongyang now emphasizes that he regards the brief 400-word accord reached at this summit as the very beginning of the talks, and not as a promise to disarm unilaterally
. first step of a simultaneous step-by-step, step-by-step approach, culminating in denuclearization, "said Joel Wit, a former state department official who participated in the negotiation of a nuclear deal with North Korea in 1994.
The statement of North Korea could also indicate that it considered the four points of the Trump-Kim agreement as a timetable. Denuclearization was the third item on the list. The first point was to establish "new relations between the United States and the DPRK", followed by efforts to build "a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean peninsula". The statement released by Pyongyang on Saturday said that "the first process of defusing But the North Korean Foreign Ministry complained Saturday that the Pompeo team had" never mentioned the issue of the Establishment of a peace regime on the Korean peninsula "while they were in Pyongyang. Instead, according to the statement, the United States had continued to call for "CVIT": complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization. This term has been used several times by Pompeo and other US officials to describe Washington's goals in its talks with Pyongyang, although the State Department has recently started using another term in its statements. official: total denuclearization.
saw in him major concessions – the destruction of the Punggye-ri nuclear test site in May and the planned dismantling of an intercontinental ballistic missile test facility which, she said, would constitute a "physical check" of a freeze of missile production. 19659011] Vipin Narang, an expert on the proliferation of weapons at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said the latter detail was particularly noteworthy. "They view the test site as a larger concession than the one for which it is credited," Narang said. He noted that regional allies like Japan might fear that only long-range missiles are included.
The statement also implied that these measures were superior to the suspension by the United States of joint military exercises with South Korea. a highly reversible measure that can be resumed anytime and at any time, as all of its military strength remains intact. "
Such comments clearly showed that North Korea was finally seeking the withdrawal of US troops from the Korean Peninsula." The North has never seen denuclearization in a vacuum, but in the context of the United States. a larger ensemble and one thing that is only envisaged after a peace regime, "said Kim." In other words, after US troops have withdrawn and that the US-South Korean military exercises were completed. . . abolished. "
While the statement left the door open for further discussion, it may set the tone for moving forward." Bruce Klingner, former CIA analyst and North Korean expert on Heritage Foundation, said the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula meant for North Korea "a global arms control in which it would abandon its arsenal." United States, abandon theirs. "
The United States can not – not agree with the goals of North Korea, but Wit and others said the talks should continue, suggesting that the United States needed to find a special negotiator to meet with them. North Koreans, Mr. Wit said it was "whimsical to think it could be done overnight", but that could possibly be done.
North Korea seems to believe so too. Despite the harsh language used In the statement of the Foreign Ministry last Saturday, he remained respectful of a man whose views on the negotiations are really crucial.
"We always cherish our good faith to President Trump". Read more:
Coverage of post-correspondents from around the world
Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news
[ad_2]
Source link
