[ad_1]
According to information obtained by PAP, during the investigation, the prosecutor's office stated that sexual rents had been provided in the apartment rented by the deputy, but that it was not There was no reason to believe that the deputy was involved in the proceedings, which happened in the apartment
According to the findings of the prosecutor's office, the deputy was informed by d & # 39; Other people in the way of using his apartment, but he at first minimized the notification. It was only after a few weeks that he took action in this case – the PAP at the prosecutor's office informed
that a woman who was renting a flat was the only person in the house. one MP testified that she was providing sexual services, but none of them benefited
. The Prosecutor's Office in Legnica, then he was transferred to the Regional Prosecutor's Office in Krakow
The decision on the termination is now legally binding, no one has lodged a complaint. In a separate thread, excluded from the case, the prosecutor's office examines the financial statements of the deputy
Saturday, the newspaper Gazeta w Krakowie
The case concerns the events of January 2016. Then at Sejm – during the discussion on changes in the prosecutor's office during the votes – Robert Kropiwnicki asked a lot of questions. At the end of the vote, Patryk Jaki, Deputy Minister of Justice, took the floor. "The situation is difficult because MP Kropiwnicki goes to the rostrum and talks about standards many times, the problem is that people in Kropiwnicki district complain that Mr. Kropiwnicki runs a social agency in his apartment," Jaki said. . In connection with this statement, Kropiwnicki sued Jakiego for the protection of personal rights, demanding an apology and paying 20 thousand. zlotys in favor of Legnica Hospital
He reported that he has no influence on the behavior of the person to whom he rents an apartment. The rental agreement has been canceled.
In June, the Supreme Court overturned the court's decision to dismiss Kropiwnicki's lawsuit against Jaki for the protection of personal rights; the court will have to deal with the case. Earlier, the court dismissing the trial found that What Protection of Immunity
[ad_2]
Source link
