[ad_1]
President Andrzej Duda postulated that on November 10 and 11, the Poles would answer 10 referendum questions. They concerned, inter alia, constitutional changes, the strengthening of referendums, the determination of the model of the exercise of power and the election of deputies or the constitutional guarantees of the accession of Poland to the NATO and the European Union
. If the referendum had a stake of about 10%, it would show a tangible erosion of the sovereign's support for power. The authorities who call the sovereign a lot. It was about that the position should have been to ensure that the referendum took place because it would be an undeniable defeat – said Jarosław Włodarczyk .
– I would like to draw your attention to the fact that it is a political calculation of the PiS. Politicians probably expected low turnout. Poles do not tend to walk and participate in referendums of this type. The low turnout would hit Law and Justice in local elections during the election campaign. – commented Artur Kowalski
Deputy Head of the Presidential Chancellery Paweł Mucha said that the result of the Senate vote on the consultative referendum on constitutional changes does not put an end to negotiations on the constitution. The president's minister added that the Senate's decision showed that there was a need for "serious constitutional thinking"
– Minister Mucha's golden mouth for such statements. It's a fantastic theater. Mucha said the president did not lose, but against the society that was interested, senators abstained from voting for various reasons. It's hard to say that nothing has happened. We will now look at the president who will be gathered. We should take some things seriously, and that's what political theater has become. – declared Jarosław Włodarczyk.
– We had an example of work on judicial acts, where the president felt un-consulted and vetoed. Now we have a slightly opposite situation, where the President has not consulted his initiative with the camp from which he comes – Artur Kowalski
The draft resolution the referendum also concerned basic support for families, acquired pension rights, better protection of agriculture and the administrative division of the state [19659002] – These questions are separate. Entering a social program to the content of the constitution is not justified. The chair could emphasize in a certain way the role of the family and that would be good. However, the content of some questions is causing a lot of thought. Will the average citizen understand the consequences of his choices? The second question: are we sure we need a constitutional change? I think so. – added Kowalski.
– It's really grotesque. Despite the fact that I believe we have smart citizens, I do not think anyone can answer them properly. There are two contradictory questions in the President's proposals. In a question, the President asked if we are constitutional guaranteeing membership of the European Union, and in the other if we are in favor of the entry into the constitution of the principle of superiority of the Basic Law on International and European Law. Well, the judgments of the European Court of Justice say that conventional law overrides national law, so the introduction of this issue means the withdrawal of European treaties and the exit of the Union European Union, which goes against the seventh referendum question. Who would get it? – Question J arosław Włodarczyk.
More in the overall program
Debate of the day conducted Joanna Niziołek.
PJ / PAP / IAR [19659002] _______________________
Date of issue: 25/07/18
Time of publication: 18 : 05
[ad_2]
Source link
