[ad_1]
For two years in prison, suspended for two years, he was sentenced on Friday by the Poznań District Court of Piotr B. in a case related to the bankruptcy Staropolski Bank in 2000. Four other people heard the sentences with him.
Piotr B., the head of the supervisory board of the bank, was also fined 100,000 zł. The case was in court for 14 years. In 2016, the trial had to start from the beginning
The court found Piotr B. guilty of causing significant damage in 1998 and 1999 to the bank Staropolski SA in Poznan, rising to at minus 127 million zlotys. . Four former members of the Board of Directors of Staropolski Bank were sentenced with him. Three other people were acquitted by the court against the charges laid
: "create a one-person management system in which the implementation of significant economic commitments of entities participating in the system operating under the name of Auto-Kredyt-Polska depended on his decision. () succeeded in abusing the rights of the members of the bank's board of directors and in not fulfilling their obligations, which led the Bank to damage the property of Bank Staropolski SA ".
The court decided that this should happen, among other things by not creating, despite the regulations in force and contrary to the recommendations, specific provisions for the risks related to interbank deposits established in a Ukrainian bank. interbank deposits of 93 million marks and 99 million dollars from a bank in Ukraine to a disadvantaged Moldovan bank
"The sentence I was able to impose was one to ten years. the fact that the defendants are actually punished – from 14 or 18 years of age, results from the fact that the proceedings are ongoing, they are stigmatized all the time, their earning potential is limited – they really have the responsibility. – Judge Sławomir Szymański said in the justification of the verdict
He stressed that the prosecutor demanded the most severe sentence for all the defendants – 10 years in prison, no matter how long they held their position in the bank. "I do not understand that, there must be something like the individualization of the punishment," the judge pointed out
.As we noted, the defendants made a mistake, but have operated in a specific system – legal and surveillance – 1990s. that in such a case, they should be punished as severely as possible, it is only a reprisal for the result, this does not hold no account of what happened then, there are many factors to blame. the judge in the justification of the judgment noted that the object of the proceedings is only "indirectly related to the bankruptcy of the Staropolski Bank". "None of the defendants is accused of having bankrupted the bank, causing only damage" – he stressed. He also pointed out that because of the scale of the damage, he inflicted heavy fines
and repeatedly criticized the prosecutor's work. "In the vast majority of cases, the allegations that were made were incorrectly correct from the legal point of view, sometimes contradictory." If the prosecutor in 2004 has fulfilled the task, this case will be judged 10 years shorter. "He noted that the prosecutor, in defining the harm to each of the accused, had told him about 560 million In the meantime, the defendants were affiliated with the Staropolski Bank in different years.
As he pointed out, none of the defendants took advantage of the action in question. "This is not true what appeared in the press that a certain amount of money was appropriated by one of the accused," said the judge.
The proceedings were pending before the court of 14. It was preceded by a four-year prosecutor's investigation.As a result of the juror's illness, in January 2016, the trial after more than 300 lawsuits had to start again.After the change of the composition of the court, before the announcement of the verdict, the court set more than 90 date
Piotr B. was arrested in 2000. The trial in the Poznań District Court began in 2005. As the media reported at the time, the defendants had to expose the bank. damage of 560 million zlotys. About 40,000 people were to be involved in this case. The people who made their savings in this bank
The district court of Poznań declared bankruptcy of the bank Staropolski in February 2000, less than a month after the suspension of its activities by the Banking Supervision Commission. The former Polish bank, on 12 January 2000, had a deficit of 473.76 million zlotys. The KNB justified its decision to suspend Bank Staropolski's activities by exceeding the bank's credit concentration standards.
"It's a very difficult question, I think, except the case FOZZ, the most difficult in Polish justice. There is no doubt that this case is not over – this is his first step, what we have heard will certainly result in a call from the prosecutor's office and the accused, "Wojciech said Bogdan, lawyer after the announcement of the verdict
"It seems that the court wanted to find a common ground between the efforts of the prosecution to prove his guilt – a court of law. half a billion losses (accused by the prosecutor) estimated at 127 million, which makes a fundamental difference. on whether or not a limitation occurred in this case "- added Mariusz Marłaczyk (PAP)
author: Rafał Pogrzebny
publisher: Marcin Kucharzewski
rpo / mark / krap /
[ad_2]
Source link
