[ad_1]
Since the launch of the first Galaxy Note, this line is aimed at consumers who want a bigger smartphone, focused on productivity!
And it's even very well behaved on the market! However, this only happened because other manufacturers like Huawei, LG or even Xiaomi still did not have a significant presence in the market … what they have now!
That's why Samsung's market share is getting slow. your rivals!
In addition, sales below the expected Galaxy S9 and S9 + might well mean that the company has no choice but to merge the two lines in the future.
Although this is not yet confirmed, the Galaxy S10 + can prove to be the natural substitute of the Galaxy Note! Including the traditional S-Pen that delights fans of this device.
Which is perfectly logical, since currently the Note has exactly the same specifications of the Galaxy S of the same year! With the only differences in the inclusion of a pen and a slightly larger screen.
That said, rumors about the new Galaxy S10 already dominate the Internet! With some of them mentioning the implementation of a system with 5 cameras, with 3 in the back and two in front.
- Samsung Galaxy S10 – All we know up to now! – click here
One advantage of this decision is that production and development costs will be much lower! In addition, this will allow the team to focus much more on designing a single high end instead of two.
Another important fact is that the Galaxy S10 should be the first Samsung 5G smartphone. Make this version even more relevant! In parallel, Samsung has also started to strongly inspire Apple! In anticipation of the launch of three handsets in 2019, as will the Cupertino company in September.
However, it can be difficult for Samsung to keep a single line relevant throughout the year! As we can see on the decreases in traditional demand on the Galaxy S line over the months.
What do you think of this? Will the classic "Galaxy S" and "Galaxy Note" lines, which are now a milestone in the Android world, be merged? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.
Source
Source link
