Youtubers: after all, what is Article 13? Everything you need to know



[ad_1]

The proposal was voted in September, but it is only since the beginning of the week that the subject has taken a bigger dimension in Portugal, after one of the biggest national youtubeurs has shot a video on the subject. After all, will the Internet as we know it end? The simplest answer is no, but it will change.

On September 12, the European Parliament approved a proposal which aims to improve the regulation of copyright in the European Union. Two of the articles in the document, 11 and 13, have raised the most questions and controversies for allegedly threatening the freedom to create and share content on the Internet.

This proposal has not yet entered into force and will be voted on again in January 2019, which generated a movement to avoid it. It is in this context that the video of Paulo Borges, better known as the Wuant scene, has decided, like other journalists, to alert the fans of the changes that Article 13, in particular, will bring to creators and users of platforms such as Youtube. It is the platform itself that has encouraged this creator and other creators to do it. However, the video (which has become viral) contains several inaccuracies that raise the alarm.

In a simple way, platforms such as YouTube or Facebook already have software that limits the use of copyright-protected material, such as music or videos. If a user tries to put a Beatles song online, for example, that content is detected and blocked (or even erased) or, in other cases, all the revenue generated by the advertisement goes to the same level. author. If the behavior repeats, on some platforms, the user may even be prevented from loading the content.

The problem with this model is that only content included in a "list" or reported is deleted or blocked. The new proposal aims to overcome this problem and empower the platforms for all content posted, rather than users. In practice, and to avoid copyright lawsuits, platforms block any content that may be in an illegal situation. But that does not mean everything, as it is described on a page of the European Parliament where the main doubts are explained (RIGHT HERE)

In practice, the new proposal aims to ensure copyright compliance by users and that artists and content creators do not see their works disseminated by third parties without permission.

Below you will find answers to frequently asked questions.

Will Youtube erase channels that violate copyright?

No. Youtube will block in the European Union only content containing images or music, for example, that violates rights laws.

But does that mean that the parodies and the SAME will end?

No. On the FAQ page, it is clear that SAME (humorous pictures, sentences and videos), parodies and humorous sketches are exceptions, protected by the freedom of expression, which means that users will be able to continue to share this content. . content. The proposal is unclear as to the "covers" of protected songs, but these can also be blocked because the original lyrics and melodies belong to the artists or the publisher in charge.

Will Europeans lose access to thousands of videos?

Yes, as there is a proposal at European level, users from other countries will still be able to create reaction videos and covers, but these contents will not be available in the EU. ;European Union.

Will old videos be affected?

Yes, if the proposal remains unchanged in the European Union, any content infringing the new law, whether recent or not, may be blocked.

Online encyclopedias will they end?

Online encyclopedias generated by independent users – such as Wikipedia – will not be affected by the new law.

Will Google be in Europe? Will Google Images disappear?

No, Google will not end and the company has not commented on the image bank. However, because of Article 11, Google News may cease to exist as we know it or serve the purpose for which it was created.

What does Article 11 say? Will I be unable to share links? Will I have to pay?

Article 11 was created for media groups. Platforms such as Google can no longer share links to news without permission or compensation from authors (newspapers, radios, televisions). However, this does not affect single users. There is also no "link fee", which means that you do not have to pay to share an article on social networks, for example, as described on the FAQ page.

Does the vote on the proposal include Portuguese? Is this the final version?

Yes, the proposal was voted by the European Parliament, which includes Portuguese MEPs. PSD, PS (except Francisco Assis), CDS and MPT voted for. PCP and BE voted against. However, it has not yet entered into force, the document will be voted on again in January.

Is the creator of the Internet against the proposal?

Yes, Tim Berners-Lee, the creator of the World Wide Web, believes that this proposal involves monitoring the Internet.

[ad_2]
Source link