[ad_1]
A series of videos produced by youtubers alerting on "the end of the Internet", including the message "My channel will be deleted", has sowed confusion and doubt among users, especially the youngest. The arguments are the same as those circulating online since the beginning of the year, as the European Parliament was preparing to vote for the new copyright proposal, but they are gaining in popularity. strength with the communication capacity of those who are the idol of the new generations.
Many articles have already been written on the subject and the arguments used by Wuant – which are similar to those of many other youtubers who seem to have used the same scenario – have already been disassembled by newspapers, the Polygraph fact-checking site and own representation of the European Commission. in Portugal, sent an open letter to your young consumers explaining, point by point, what the proposed legislation advocated, and to ensure that the Internet does not end.
There are arguments from both sides and, just as there are petitions and moves against the law, many artists and writers' associations defend the approval of the law, as was the case in an unlikely alliance between several organizations in Portugal.
What is it?
Since the preparation of the finalization of the proposal on copyright in the European Parliament, the campaigns of those who advocate a "free Internet" have begun to multiply, as opposed to what is called censorship and blocking creativity. The proposal of the Copyright Directive that Europe ensures that it wants to harmonize rights between the physical world and the digital world is at stake. This proposal was approved on 12 September by the European Parliament (EP), but its final wording is still under negotiation. in a trilogue process (negotiation between the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council)
At the time, thousands of e-mails, phone calls and messages were sent to parliamentarians, under unprecedented pressure and called false information, which had been designated as orchestrated by the major platforms Web who had never taken the lead in this open war. At least until now.
In recent weeks, YouTube has become more active in this "activism" and has published a long article aimed at "creators" to explain their arguments, which had already been questioned by several experts in the field. In a more direct approach, he also sent personalized emails to some of the biggest youtubers to ask them to speak.
This led to the publication of a series of videos of Portuguese journalists talking about Article 13, with more or less strong titles and arguments and arguments more or less inflamed. "After the new law will be the end of youtube ?!", The video of Tiagovski was it the 24th, but others followed, like that of Pi "The end of YouTube … Article 13" of November 27 and Wuant "My channel will be deleted", published the same day. It is the one that has reached the highest number of views – 1.4 million at the time of publication of this article and number 1 among the most popular – has been reported by several media.
They all use more or less the same arguments, and it is true that they took effect and pushed many young people to question their parents about a "such" Article 13, lest the Internet come to an end . In the case of Wuant, in addition to getting the message across and asking to sign the petition, there is a call for a "revolution". "It's not right with petitions, it's only going to be a revolution," he explains in the video. He states that Google will cease to exist as it currently exists, that social networks will be restricted and will probably be blocked. "And many people say that it is the end of the Internet and I agree."
"You know that m **** is serious when YouTube sends an e-mail saying," You have to talk about it. "If YouTube is worried, I must also be worried," he says.
The video sparked many doubts among the youth, and even some of the choro scenes that were reported worsened the situation and, as mentioned in several tweets, the video was also broadcast in schools.
Miguel Carretas, general manager of AUDIOGEST, admits that Internet users are really worried about the communication of YouTube, but that this one "rests on false assumptions and that YouTube knows that they are false". Between the critics of misinformation and "absurd absurdity" for some arguments, such as the inability of young players to wear a t-shirt of some brand in the videos, the expert in law & # 39; 39, author and representative of the music industry warns that they forget various legal principles, such as the rule of exhaustion of rights and the difference between the author's right and industrial property.
"The directive does not deal with exceptions to copyright, but increases these protections," he said, pointing out that the law applies the principles of copyright to digital and warned it against the balance of power between Google platforms and Facebook) and the music industry, the former are Goliath and the latter, David, with much less strength in an unequal struggle.
"With the new legislation, we still have some additional arguments for [as plataformas] negotiate more with us and treat us better […] will reverse the paradigm, "admits Miguel Carretas.
Does YouTube no longer control protected content?
That's one of the questions that was asked. In fact, the creators themselves know that if they make a video with a protected song or pictures of a movie for which they have no rights, this one is quickly erased from YouTube (and other channels like Facebook, for example). To do this, ContentID, a tool in which Google has invested millions of dollars, is increasingly effective and powerful, and is also used to detect videos of pornographic messages, pedophiles or xenophobia or inciting violence.
So what's the difference? Miguel Carretas explains that the paradigm shift is that YouTube only realizes this ex post validation and that it is the rights holders who have the responsibility to search for and request the deletion. With the new legislation, platforms will be forced to detect content that violates the copyright at the time of download and will have to negotiate with each entity to obtain a license on the content, or will block everything. But this blocking does not apply to original content, but only to those who are protected – such as songs or movies and comics, photographs, and so on.
As the letter from the Portuguese representation of the European Commission underlines, "Article 13 will not end the Internet. On the contrary, it will give you strength as creators of content. With Article 13, you can tell YouTube how you want to use your videos. Thus, users who copy or use your work without your permission will stop taking advantage of these misuses. Similarly, YouTube will stop earning money. "
Still today, at a conference organized by the DNS.pt Association, Pedro Boucherie Mendes has devalued the video published by Youtuber Wuant, showing that this goes against those who argue that there should be such regulation and remembering that to make a television program, one must pay fees. and that "Wuant with his little videos can use whatever you want, because on the Internet you can do whatever you want." https://tek.sapo.pt/noticias/internet/artigos/a-internet-e-an-weird-site-can-conclude-that-the-high-of-internet-sao-as-persons
"I do not like working in a highly regulated area and there are" wuants "that steal the public and are in an area that is western," said Pedro Boucherie Mendes, explaining further that the youtuber probably would not want someone to earn money by printing his face on a t-shirt or mugs and selling. But he also stressed that he had nothing against youtuber, although he explains that he also had nothing in favor.
Interestingly, last night a video posted by youtuber Nuno Agonia shows another perspective and a lot more consideration. In "Finally Article 13", Youtuber unambiguously explains his vision and admits that he "did not want to play the role of the EU. […] it is not easy. "The problem lies in the power and the money that drives it" and in networks like YouTube and Google that are becoming very powerful and that the European Union wants to limit, he said.
"I do not know how much YouTube is guilty of what happened," said Nuno Agonia, also referring to messages sent by the platform to youtubers and remembering that as a platform, YouTube wanted the videos be viral to earn more money. "There are many lobbies and many interests," he warns.
Nuno Agonia explains in a 17-minute video, unmounted and unmounted, that he has "a mixture of feelings", but that the Internet is a jungle and that you can not protect the right of action. ;author. "Everything has a limit, there must be rules," he says, although he has made sure he does not want the freedoms to be limited. "I do not want to lose my freedom of expression," he said, saying that YouTube was fantastic and that he had changed his life. It allowed him to meet great people. this freedom.
Editorial Note: For this article, we contacted several people and tried to talk to young people like wuant, Tiagovski and Pi since yesterday, but we did not get answers.
[ad_2]
Source link
