[ad_1]
The leftist parties have called for a new vote on the proposals for the 2019 state budget amendment to ensure that teachers, magistrates and security forces are fully taken into account in their progress. career, putting pressure on the PSD for that it alters the situation. vote and approve the proposal rejected by the PS. But the vote was no different and the only guarantee that the budget will have will be, even if the government is forced to return to the negotiating table.
Proposals had already been voted on Monday afternoon in the Committee on Budget and Finance, but parties could ask for a new vote, this time in plenary, with all MPs and parliamentary groups. This new vote allowed for a new discussion on the theme, though shorter, than the left bloc, the PCP and the Greens exercised to pressure the PSD, the only party with enough votes to approve the proposals. left.
Ana Mesquita, PCP, argued that the workers would be better served if the Communists' proposal had been approved in its entirety – the proposal guaranteed a recovery of full service time within a maximum of seven years. But he quickly turned to the PSD, saying that it was "clear as water that the PSD and the CDS have a position vis-à-vis the workers and a different position at the Parliament". "The PCP does not abandon the fight, neither in the budget, nor in the assessment of the Parliament, nor in the street, beside the workers, for the complete count of the time of service", assured the Communist.
Joana Mortágua of the Left Bloc said that the PSD had become the great defender of these workers in Parliament and even defended them "better than the trade unions", but that its promises had remained a dead letter. "The mountain has given birth to a mouse, what we want here to appeal to the PSD, is to recognize that we made a mistake yesterday and vote this proposal of the left bloc," he said.
The leader of the Greens, Heloísa Apolónia, went further and said that "the PSD was completely unmasked from the vote of the proposals" and assured that it would continue the work, but "with consistency and loyalty", in an allusion to the position of the PSD.
On the right, the PSD defended its proposal by claiming that the government had "committed a grave breach" of commitments made with teachers and this year's budget, as well as violated the letter and norm presented by the PS itself. about a year. The CDS, however, criticized the way the government handled the process. He said the approved standard is the best way to give the government a new opportunity to reopen this negotiation in a fair way, while rejecting the lack of transparency in the negotiations. the impact of the full count of teachers' service time and other special careers in public administration, which the party claims to have been demanding for more than a year. "We want fair and achievable negotiations that are not just a promise and are viable for more than a year," said Ana Rita Bessa.
The defense of the position of the government and the PS was made by Socialist MP Porfirio Silva, who opened the debate. The Socialist accused the unions of not moving "one millimeter" and not to enter the negotiations, hoping that the end result would be that all their demands be met. For proposals from the left, the deputy said that "it makes no sense to require negotiation and at the same time to want to already fix the final result in the budget of the 39; state. "
The end result was the same. The DSP only approved its own proposal, which equates to a proposal from the SSC and a part of a PCP proposal along the same lines. That is to say that in the next budget, there will be a standard equal to that which existed in this year's budget, which guarantees nothing more than bargaining. Teachers thus have a new opportunity to renegotiate with the government, which has already passed a decree-law providing only two years and nine months of service for more than nine years as the unions demand, but which does not require a union. has not been finalized yet. enacted.
Negotiations do not force the government to give more to teachers. If negotiations resume, the only guarantee available to teachers is that this progression will occur later.
Source link
