[ad_1]
Warning: The next time you want to share an image of Harry Potter, make a cover from a song to social networks or broadcast live your best moment in a computer game, the internet may not allow it.
Article 13, which is currently the subject of a large debate, has as its main objective the protection of the authors' creativity by entrusting to social networks and video-sharing platforms the filtering of contents which may constitute a violation of the author's right.
And, if approved, you can change the Internet as we know it.
With the approval of the proposal, online platforms will be required by Article 13 to create algorithms or other automatic filtering mechanisms that make it impossible to publish copyrighted images or videos.
Article 13 is therefore fatal for all those who like to share their moments on the Internet and even the famous same (gifs animated excerpts of films or series already part of the cyberculture) are at stake.
But the implications of this article go even further.
If you are a Star Wars fan and you may be wearing a picture where you are wearing an iconic Darth Vader t-shirt, be aware that if this photo reaches social networks, a process is applied against the platform where is the photo. may occur because a company owns the copyright of that image.
And yes, in addition to the process, the photo will be erased.
Positions for and against
From one side, labels and musicians such as Coldplay, Paul McCartney and the composer Ennio Morricone. On the other side of the barricade, we find almost a whole world that sees in the Internet a free place where there is no room for content regulation.
The first, in favor of Article 13 and the proposed amendments, declare that they want to defend their original products and create obstacles for the major platforms that benefit from the rights of others. The British musician, ex Beatles, even went to the European Parliament to ask for the approval of the proposal.
In Portugal, names like Salvador Sobral, Ana Moura and Rodrigo Leão also favor change.
Tim Berners-Lee, Internet creator and Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, oppose this directive and who, without ever predicting the end of the Internet, believe that this proposal will make the World Wide Web (WWW) a monitoring tool that controls users.
On the Internet, many people say that the proposal restores censorship and that it is an attack, especially for those who use social networks as a job.
Against the proposal, there is also a
Online petition that has already exceeded 3 million signatures
.
The video that triggered the alarm
The reform was proposed in 2016 and divides the opinions since then, especially with regard to its 13th. L & # 39; section.
On 12 September this year, the European Parliament's directive on copyright in the European Union. Adopted by 438 votes in favor, 226 against and 39 abstentions, the European Internet community opposed the proposal for significant copyright changes in the digital single market.
From then on, the fight for the permanence of a free Internet intensifies, YouTube sending itself a letter to its users to talk to their subscribers.
On the internet, the campaign
#SaveYourInternet
The panic set in after Wuant (Paulo Borges), one of the country's most famous youtubers, shared a video claiming that Article 13 would mark "the end of the Internet." ".
Paulo Borges, better known as Wuant, is one of Portugal's most famous youtubers, with more than three million followers and many, thanks to his video, have discovered the reality of Article 13.
But the video, built on an alarmist tone, does not correspond 100% to the truth and has scared many children who believed that the video would be the last of youtuber.
To be clear, and contrary to what Youtuber says, the Internet and platforms such as YouTube and Google will continue to exist in Europe. The platforms will have to reinvent themselves to avoid the heavy fines included in the proposal, which will be voted on again in January 2019 and promises to make the Internet a very different site.
[ad_2]
Source link
