[ad_1]
President Trump met on Friday with Slovak Prime Minister Peter Pellegrini at a meeting at the Oval Office. (Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post)
Democrats who run for president are weighting the idea of government reparations for black Americans to compensate for slavery and discrimination.
On Sunday, President Trump appeared to be supportive of the idea of reparations – for himself and in the form of an unconstitutional two-year supplement to his first term at the White House.
He retweeted a proposal from Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. to grant him two more years as a mandate to reward the lost time in the investigation of Russia. Trump wrote in a Twitter dispatch that half of his first term had been "stolen".
The argument was perhaps ironic, which led some legal experts to dismiss these comments as being bravery. Others, however, have seen the President's apparent desire to go beyond his four-year term as a breach of the rule of law. According to him, the fact that this issue was raised in a fun way was uncomfortable, especially since Trump's playful refusal, in autumn 2016, to announce that he would accept the result of an election which, according to the polls, let it be supposed, was doomed to the loss.
"I will keep you in suspense," he said at the time.
Now, as the nation prepares for Trump's reelection, the question of whether he would respect a negative outcome was again critical, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Warning that Democrats must triumph to make sure it works. away from the White House. A survey conducted last week by CNN revealed that a handful of Democratic contenders would beat Trump in a face-to-face match. Meanwhile, the president is picking up on former vice president Joe Biden, who has been among the top candidates since entering the race last month.
The emergence of these lines of battle was the context of Trump's decision to spread the idea that he owes him presidential overtime. He claims that the first two years of his presidency, that he has also says have been the most successful in history, have been denied by a coup led by the Democrats, in the form of an investigation into the interference of Russia in the elections of 2016. L & # 39; 39; was investigated by the special advocate Robert S. Mueller III, a Republican, who was appointed by another Republican Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein.
Trump had the idea of Falwell, who embodies the improbable alliance between evangelical Christians and a three-time married reality TV personality who appeared on the cover of Playboy magazine. Falwell visited Twitter on Saturday to celebrate the "Best Week Ever" for the 45th President, echoing Trump's misleading description of Mueller's survey results and touting robust economic performance.
"I am now supporting the reparations," he said, adopting the language of the Democrats who discuss what is due to historically oppressed minority groups. The evangelical leader argued that Trump should have two years added to his first term "as a repayment of the time stolen by this corrupt coup".
[Jerry Falwell Jr. can’t imagine Trump ‘doing anything that’s not good for the country’]
Trump has retweeted Falwell's statement to his 60 million followers on Sunday. Then he defended himself.
In a pair of tweets – republished Sunday night to correct a spelling mistake in his earlier statement – the president said two years of his presidency had been wasted by the "illusory lie". The rhyming slogan is his name for the investigation into electoral interference in Russia and the quest to find out if his campaign team members were working to allow foreign interference and whether he was acting illegally to obstruct to the inquiry. He also reiterated that he was denouncing the investigation as a "witch hunt" even though he mistakenly claimed that it was exonerating him.
Ignoring the constitutional limitations imposed on his tenure at a rally last month in Green Bay, Wisconsin, Trump told his supporters, "I promise that after six years I will be very happy. "He ridiculed those who warned him not to retire as" sick people ".
Among those who have sounded the alarm is Michael Cohen, the former lawyer and fixer of the president, who travels Monday to the federal prison. During a testimony before the House's oversight committee in February, Mr. Cohen explained that the fact that his former boss did not refuse to be a president with a single term was one reasons that led him to reveal his relationship with Trump.
"I am afraid that if he loses the elections in 2020, there will never be a peaceful transition of power," Cohen said. "And that's why I've agreed to appear before you today."
The legal experts were divided on the importance of the president's new complaint that he had been denied the warrant he was given.
"It does not mean anything," said Michael W. McConnell, former federal judge at the head of the Stanford Constitutional Law Center.
McConnell, who was appointed to the federal judiciary in 2001 by President George W. Bush, called the tweets "swagger".
"If there was any chance, he was serious and had the power to put his words into practice, I could be worried," he said. "But he's not serious, and he could not do anything about it, even if he was serious."
But Jon D. Michaels, a law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, said that he had taken Trump at his word.
"I do not take it lightly because the government is persistently campaigning to undermine the rule of law in many ways. called "Judges" or "Obama Judges", said Michaels. "It's disconcerting."
What Trump means is what he says, his protest "paves the way for future opportunities to neglect or challenge the legitimacy of an election," warned the constitutional law specialist.
He also noted that some of Trump's supporters on social media could learn the rules and requirements of democracy from the statements of their president on Twitter. What some perceive as an explosion, others may view it as "an alternative trajectory of how all this might unfold, departing from the basic principles of our system."
According to Michaels, there is no year of stolen presidency, and the idea of a two-year term extension is clearly unconstitutional.
"It's not like football where there is a penalty time, so they only add a few minutes at the end of the match or half-time," he said.
Unlike a parliamentary system, where censorship votes are possible and the government has a margin of maneuver to call early elections, the constitution explicitly states the regularity of elections.
Mr. Michaels noted that certain assumptions about the electoral system are in fact being questioned, including the value of the electoral college. But these discussions presume the need for a revision of the constitution, he said.
Trump is not the only president to have faced the limits of his mandate. Recently, nostalgic supporters have asked President Barack Obama to stay for a third term, which is prohibited by the 22nd Amendment.
"Four more years," they chanted during his farewell address in Chicago in January 2017.
"I can not do that," he tells them.
[ad_2]
Source link