[ad_1]
Better life
These 2 COVID Precautions May Not Be Necessary After All, New Study Finds
There are many precautions we take every day to try to stop the spread of COVID. For almost a year now, we’ve been diligently washing our hands, wearing face masks in public, and trying to keep six feet between ourselves and anyone outside of our household. But on a larger scale, different countries have taken different approaches to mitigating the virus, and even in the United States, precautions have varied from state to state. Full closures, business closures and mask warrants are just a few of the protocols being implemented around the world in an attempt to bring the virus under control. Since we had never dealt with anything equal to COVID in our lifetime, there were assumptions about how best to protect people. Now, a recent study from Stanford University found that two measures may not stop the spread of COVID as much as we thought. To see what precautions we might skip, read on and see what the future looks like. COVID, check Moderna CEO just made this chilling prediction about COVID.Read the original article on Best Life. The study compared countries that closed to those that did not. For the study, which was published in the Wiley Online Library on Jan.5, researchers looked at the growth of COVID cases in 10 countries to determine how beneficial various precautionary measures have been, looking at particularly more restrictive measures such as lockdowns and closings of businesses. COVID cases in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United States – all of which have instituted stay-at-home orders and mandatory business closures – in South Korea and Sweden, which implemented only voluntary personal precautions. to see if you’re at risk for COVID now, check out CDC says if you’re that age, you’re more likely to catch COVID now. The results showed that there was “no clear and significant benefit” to business lockdowns and closings. After comparing countries with more restrictive measures to those with less restrictive measures, it was clear to the researchers that there was “no clear and significant beneficial effect. [more restrictive measures] on the growth of cases in any country. “Their results suggest that mandatory lockdowns do not significantly stop the spread more than personal measures like social distancing and wearing masks.” We do not question the role of any public health interventions or coordinated communications about the epidemic, but we fail to find an additional benefit from door-to-door orders and business closures, ”concluded writers. And for more up-to-date COVID information straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter. Research suggests that less restrictive interventions can be just as effective. Sweden’s approach included “social distancing guidelines, discouraging international and domestic travel, and a ban on large gatherings,” while South Korea “relied on intensive investment in testing, contact tracing, and isolation of infected cases and close contacts, “according to the Stanford study. Even without more restrictive measures, Sweden and South Korea had some of the lowest pensions. As a result, the researchers concluded that “similar reductions in the growth of cases might be achievable with less restrictive interventions” similar to those implemented. implemented by these two countries. To see the CDC’s latest vaccine update, check out CDC Just Gave Shocking COVID Vaccine Update. In fact, home orders could potentially increase the spread of COVID. A study published in the journal Indoor Air in October looked at 318 epidemics in China in which three or more cases were identified. The researchers divided the outbreaks into six categories: homes, transportation, food, entertainment, shopping, and more – and found that people were 19 times more likely to contract the virus at home. Likewise, research from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill determined that your home is the most common location for transmission of COVID-19. This is probably why researchers at Stanford noted that “it It is possible that home controls may facilitate transmission if they increase person-to-person contact where transmission is effective, such as confined spaces. ”They cited a November study published in the journal Science that identified an increase transmissions and cases when ordering stay at home in Hunan, China due to intra-home transmission. COVID, check out these 3 things that could prevent almost all cases of COVID, study results.
[ad_2]
Source link