[ad_1]
All that was said before its release is that, at least on paper, the Xbox Series X is more powerful than the PS5. The former has more overall conventional power and processing capacity, while the latter has less but uses various custom tinkering and optimizations to make what it performed much more efficiently. Essentially, it’s less hardware, but more carefully designed and managed to do more for the money.
The results of the first cross-generational title comparison of “Devil May Cry: Special Edition” last week showed that the two consoles were relatively comparable – effectively offering the same frame rates, load times, and visual appearance with the advantage of switching often between the two. scene by scene, if only at a negligible level.
But it was an older game, not a game designed with the newer consoles in mind. Now, two much newer games have been compared – Ubisoft’s fall juggernaut has just released Activision’s “Assassin’s Creed Valhalla” and “Call of Duty: Black Ops – Cold War”. Both are AAA cross-platform third-party titles with “ Valhalla ” coming from a franchise infamous for failing to optimize and therefore requiring a lot more raw power to run.
These are the types of titles where the Xbox Series X is supposed to shine and clearly show its edge over the PS5. Tests of the game show, however, that with the two titles which, although close, the PS5 turns out to be better than the Xbox.
“Valhalla” is a game that has proven to be a challenge even for high end PCs. The most powerful graphics card on the market (RTX 3090) cannot achieve 4K / 60fps with the title often falling between 40-56fps and does not even support native 4K resolution according to DSO Gaming and The edge.
Both consoles use dynamic resolution targeting consistent 60fps and resolution ranging from 1440p to 4K. Now the folks at Digital Foundry have done a scan of both machines and found that the Xbox Series X version has a substantial issue when it comes to the bezel tearing, a less of a problem if you have a VRR compatible display with only a few televisions. models do – namely LG OLEDs and Samsung QLEDs from the last 2-3 years. If you have HDMI 2.1 on your TV, you probably have it.
Even so, the Xbox Series X and S were spotted with unusual stuttering even during cut scenes. Several gamers have reported that as long as you have a VRR compatible display and VRR is on, the issue essentially goes away and becomes much closer to the PS5 version (which has occasional stuttering).
But that’s not all. The frame rate is found to be more stable on the PS5 with the game sticking to 60 fps fairly consistently in scenes where the X-series drops multiple times in the very low 50s – both have maintained the same resolution throughout.
With regard to “Call of Duty”, a similar scenario occurs. Youtuber VG Tech ran the title at both 120 fps and 60 fps / with ray tracing enabled. In 120fps mode, the two were pretty consistent at 120fps in most cases, but the Xbox had more drops and occasionally fell below 110fps, while the PS5 barely left 120fps. On cut scenes, the PS5 fell to 105-110fps while the X-series fell below 100fps in points.
At 60 fps with ray tracing enabled the two were reportedly much more consistent, although here the PS5 was experiencing an issue where it could randomly drop below 60 fps during scenes it previously performed at 60 fps. ips. Either way, optimizing both the console’s SDKs and the games themselves should iron out a lot of bugs – but that certainly seems to shatter the idea that the X Series will play third-party games better.
A clear picture from this and other recent tech announcements is that more conventional power on paper automatically equaling better performance is a mistake because AMD, Sony and Apple have all made the push into redesign, production. and internal optimization. low wattage components as opposed to using higher wattage “plug and play” modular components from third party manufacturers – giving much better results in the process and at a better value for the consumer.
[ad_2]
Source link