Reds see themselves as buyers with a trading deadline



[ad_1]

Baseball Reds President Dick Williams outlined some of the Club's transaction timeline approach with The Athletic's C. Trent Rosecrans (subscription link). It should be noted in particular that the organization has no doubt about the intention of the organization to improve the workforce in the coming weeks.

"We're going to look around to see what we can do to improve ourselves, which would put us in the buyer category," says Williams. "We feel like we're at the heart of the race, so we think it's important to see what we can do to improve the club," he continued.

The Reds have improved a lot since a terrible start to the season. But they do not look much like a typical 41-46 candidate. Fortunately, they are far from being buried because of the failure of one of the only rivals in the NL Center to get away from the pack. Entering the game today, only 4.5 games allowed to separate the Cincinnati club, a cellar, Cubs. (The team in second place in the West of the Netherlands faces a deficit three times higher.)

It is wise that the Reds continue to put pressure under the circumstances. They split up with potential capital for short-term improvements during the winter. Although not all went as planned, the club has little reason to withdraw from the race with a sale that would probably not bring as much future value.

This is not to say that the Cincinnati reception envisions an all-in-one approach. Williams said the club would not focus exclusively on this year, but we will be looking to see if we find offers that make us better. "Determined to improve the prospects of the club, it seems that Williams and his staff will be more intrigued by controllable targets." (That said, he did not totally rule out the possibility of limiting efforts to acquire rental housing.)

If the Reds want to win, it seems that the NL Central has five buy-side clubs. Pirates could still pivot, or at least consider agreements that improve their future prospects without removing too many immediate talents from the list. But they will not be real sellers if they stay at some rhythm games. A quick turnaround on the part of the Cincinnati organization or one of its competitors could still change the calculation, but it seems most likely that the full pack remains in the race.

It is fascinating to think about how this dynamic will shape the market. On the one hand, most potential rental goals on these lists, if not all, will not go on sale. Although most teams operate only as limited buyers, all will likely consider adding assets. This will distort overall market development, especially if NL Central teams engage in direct transactional competition or outbidding with their cross-division competitors.

[ad_2]

Source link