[ad_1]
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee seek to formally define what President Jerrold Nadler, DN.Y., called the impeachment proceeding against President Trump, the party's leading member, Doug Collins, a member of the House of Commons. Ga., To entice members to stumble themselves throughout the process.
Collins pointed out what he saw as problems with the way the Democrats conducted their investigation, claiming that they had acted outside the limits imposed by the rules of the House and could have made false statements. during judicial filings.
Democrats are preparing to formally define the probe of prevention despite the past resistance of NANCY PELOSI
"They have described themselves terribly in the past eight months and continue to dig their holes," Collins told Sunday Morning Futures.
The committee's Democrats plan to vote on the definition of the survey, through a resolution that would outline the limits of the investigation, reported Politico. Collins said that is not the way that impeachment investigations are conducted.
"If they really want to do that, they have to initiate the impeachment process," he said, highlighting the rules that invite the House to rule on the approval of an investigation by Accused. "It's just a show, a parody, and frankly, they should be ashamed.
The Georgian Republican said that Democrats "can change the rules of committees as long as they do not violate the rules of the House."
TULSI GABBARD SAYS THAT THE ACCOMPANYING OF TRUMPES WOULD BE "TAKE OUR COUNTRY APART"
In early August, Nadler told CNN that a "formal imputation procedure" was in progress, even though he had filed a petition with the court requesting the disclosure of secret documents from the US grand jury. investigation in Russia by the special advocate Robert Mueller. A case filed by a court in a separate case following the refusal of former White House lawyer Don McGahn to comply with a subpoena, indicated that an impeachment investigation was under way since March. Other statements from various Democrats who called for an inquiry have sown confusion over whether such an investigation had already begun.
Collins referred to the inconsistencies of the Democrats, and how the proposed resolution to define an investigation they claimed was happening could lead to complications in legal battles.
"They told the court (…) that they had put in place an appropriate procedure for sensitive documents and sensitive documents of the grand jury, and they filed a document in which they said it was safe. We sent him a letter saying, "You do not have that." Now, this resolution seems to solve this problem.I want to know if they will go back to the courts and say, "Sorry judge, we lied. "
Several Democrats, however, had cited various sources as to why they could conduct an indictment investigation without a vote from the entire House. A recent file tabled by a group of Democrats in the committee cited their power of impeachment under s. 1 of the Constitution. Ted Deutsche, D-Fla., In the Sun-Sentinel, South Florida, asserted that a vote in the House had been necessary in the past, but that the broad powers given to committees by the amendments made in 2015 allowed them to go forward. impeachment investigation.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, has not yet joined her colleagues to fully support the impeachment process. Democratic presidential candidate, Tulsi Gabbard, of Hawaii, said in a new interview Sunday that she was opposed to an impeachment investigation by President Trump because it would "tear our country apart".
When asked whether the lingering pressure for dismissal was the result of Nadler's concern over the main leftist opponent, Lindsey Boylan, Collins said: "That certainly seems like that", considering of his recent behavior.
"He just keeps taking a left left," Collins said.
Brie Stimson of Fox News contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link