Rep. John Yarmuth does not agree with Pelosi: the impeachment procedure is "inevitable"



[ad_1]

"For me, it's not a question of whether it's a matter of" when "and it's probably not the right time at the moment, but I think that's not the right time to do it. at some point this will be inevitable, "said CNN representative John Yarmuth, Erin Burnett on" Erin Burnett OutFront. "

Comments put the Democratic House of Kentucky chairman of the House Budget Committee at odds with Pelosi, who said he was not in favor of Trump's dismissal, even though she believes he is unfit for the presidency, according to an interview with Washington Post magazine published Monday. . The question has divided congressional democrats.

"I am not in favor of impeachment," said the California Democrat, adding, "Impeachment is a source of division for the country, unless something so compelling and damning is bipartisan, do not think we should go that route because it divides the country, and it's not worth it. "

Yarmuth said that there was a "validity" in Pelosi's argument, "and I respect it, and in the end it will be his calling." But, he said, "I think that the power of impeachment is provided in the Constitution for a reason, and if we do not use it, then it loses its meaning, especially when you have a President who committed crimes while he was in office, abused the power of his office and many other reasons why I think he's committed impenetrable offenses. "

The Congressman said: "In fact, the process has probably started with the inquiries opened by the Judiciary Committee, so I think we are on the right track."

The Judiciary Committee of the House announced last week an extensive investigation into the president's administration, business, campaign and transition. The investigation would lay the groundwork for impeachment proceedings if Democrats pursued this path.

Yarmuth said that he was not sure that there are currently enough Democrats to vote in favor of dismissal. He does not think that dismissal can be a "political calculation", but rather an "acknowledgment of constitutional responsibility".

The congressman argued that the multiple investigations into the president – including the investigation by the special advocate Robert Mueller – in Russia – had to take their course in order to have all the information available before Start the process.

[ad_2]

Source link