Robert Kraft's legal team has filed a motion to annul the planned publication of a video by prosecutors in a prostitution case

by



[ad_1]

Kraft's attorneys argued that broadcasting the video would violate the constitutional rights of their clients and hinder their chances of a fair trial.

"Mr. Kraft has a clear and profound interest in any potential disclosure of the sensitive elements at issue, which, among other things, portrays him naked, and should therefore be allowed to intervene to protect his interests and to inform the Court's decision," the defense motion said.

The Palm Beach County Attorney General's Office announced earlier the release of a video showing Kraft and 24 other men charged after incursion into a multi-jurisdictional case for several months, according to court documents.

The release would come not in the case against Kraft, but in the case of two women accused of running the Orchids of Asia Day Spa and that Kraft is accused of condescending, according to court documents.

As the repository of the archives, prosecutors say the current law requires them to disclose the evidence to the media. They will "pixelate or blur images of obscene or pornographic images before making these recordings public, in the absence of a court order," court documents said.

It was not clear when prosecutors had the intention to publish the video.

No decision at the hearing on Friday

At a hearing held on Friday, Judge Leonard Hanser did not rule on the publication of a video but asked all parties to submit their proposals for orders. here Tuesday.

Hundreds of people have been charged in the sting involving several massage parlors and day spas in Florida. Kraft faces two counts of prostitution solicitation. He pleaded not guilty and requested a jury trial.

Prosecutors offered to waive the charges in exchange for fines, community work and an admission of guilt while he was being tried, but a source close to file told CNN that Kraft would not agree to it.
"I'm really sorry," he said in a statement last month. "I know I've hurt and disappointed my family, my close friends, my co-workers, our fans and many others who are rightly expecting me to a higher level."

Friday's hearing took place after the media, including CNN, requested that the video be broadcast.

Video "essentially pornography" say lawyers

Regardless of whether the media can get the video, Kraft's lawyers asked the judge to keep the video out of court. In court documents, his lawyers allege that the investigators provided false information in the affidavit in order to obtain a warrant to sting, thus rendering the video inadmissible. A hearing on this subject is scheduled for April 26.

Kraft's legal team argued that the video was "essentially pornography" and asked a judge to prevent the broadcast of these videos in the media, in part because they claimed that it would violate Kraft's right to privacy.

Lawyer William Burck told the judge that it was essential to prevent the media from accessing the video before the court ruled on his eligibility for trial.

If the media is allowed to broadcast the video, but the court declares that the film is out of order and the case is still going on, many potential jurors will have seen the video and will be contaminated with evidence that it is not. they were not supposed to take into account, Burck. argued.

Media coalition lawyers argued that the public had the right to view the video and that Kraft did not enjoy the right of confidentiality as an accused in a criminal case.

In the documents filed on Wednesday, Attorney General Dave Aronberg said he could not wait for a decision on Kraft's court challenge.

"The legislative scheme of the Public Records Act does not allow a bailee to delay the production of documents in order to allow the settlement of a constitutional challenge to the disclosure of documents," he wrote.

Keith Allen, Rosa Flores and Hollie Silverman of CNN contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link