[ad_1]
"I have trouble putting food on the table and paying rent," he said.
He added that he had published the Instagram picture without thinking that a photo of Judge Jackson apparently featuring a viewfinder's crosshair could threaten the safety of the judge or third party. "I can not rationalize my thinking because I did not think," he said.
The judge firmly rejected this explanation. As a seasoned political propagandist, she said: "Roger Stone understands perfectly the power of words and the power of symbols." She added: "There is nothing ambiguous about the reticles."
Judge Jackson stated that Mr. Stone was so anxious to draw public attention that only a strict gag order would prevent him from using his public platform to incite his supporters to make inflammatory comments. Although he insisted that he was deeply sorry for his actions, she said her apology sounded "hollow." And she added that her "evolutionary" story about the origin of the Instagram message was not believable.
"Mr. Stone could not even keep his story directly on the booth, let alone one day to another," she said.The chief prosecutor in this case, Jonathan Ian Kravis, Assistant Attorney in the United States, also accused Mr. Stone of concealing his remarks by stating that he could not remember who could have given him pictures of Judge Jackson.
"You do not remember the names of all the volunteers who worked for you four days ago?", He asked.
Mr. Stone's position arrived a few days after Judge Jackson prevented Mr. Stone from making public statements about the courthouse marches that "constitute a substantial risk of causing material injury to this case". Her new order imposes the same restrictions as those she imposed. lawyers in the case.
"From that moment, the defendant can no longer speak publicly about this case – period. No statement on the case on television, on the radio, in print reporters or on the internet. No posts on social media, "said Judge Jackson. She added that her order also applied to surrogates who could speak for Mr. Stone.
She said that Mr. Stone could continue to solicit donations for his legal defense fund, but that he could only note that he had pleaded not guilty – without commenting to the judge, prosecutors, witnesses or anyone involved in the case.
[ad_2]
Source link