Roger Stone's lawyers have come up with some very creative ideas – ThinkProgress



[ad_1]

Roger Trump's longtime confidant and politician, Roger Stone, has been raising funds for his legal defense against charges of obstruction of charges brought by Special Advocate Robert Mueller. Now his legal team is struggling with a new case that tries to dismiss the charges against him – in a rather creative way.

A delivery of the new depot? Stone, like everyone in the country, wants to see the full and uncommitted version of the Mueller report.

Stone faces charges ranging from lying in front of Congress to tampering with witnesses after prosecutors attempt to conceal information about what he knew about Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's emails. , hacked by Russian agents and broadcast via WikiLeaks. (John Podesta is one of the founders of the Center for American Progress.) ThinkProgress is a freelance news editorial site hosted at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.)

Stone pleaded not guilty and pledged to fight the charges, and claims that the case has destroyed him financially. Since then, he has launched a legal defense fund and started peddling t-shirts on his website claiming "Roger Stone has done nothing wrong!" So that he and his followers can, like his website, Says, "defend yourself against DEEP STATE HIT SQUAD by Robert MUELLER. TODAY & # 39; HUI! "

In new legal filings Friday night, Stone's lawyers requested access to the full and un-validated version of the Mueller report, claiming it "was the last vestige of the investigation" and that They believe that the report of the special advocate may contain Cas. Having the full report is the only way that Peter can determine "whether or not he is selectively prosecuted" by the special advocate, they say.

Stone's legal team also filed motions to dismiss the indictments against him for apparently creative reasons.

Stone is accused of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his communication with WikiLeaks and his possession of documents showing these interactions. Stone allegedly lied to the committee that conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi had warned him that pirated emails would be broadcast via WikiLeaks, claiming that comedian Randy Credico acted as his "middleman" with WikiLeaks. He also reportedly pressured Credico to save that fake account.

During the 2016 campaign, Stone claimed to have close relationships with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, claiming that he had told him when various Clinton-related hacked emails would be released. He also admitted to contacting Guccifer 2.0, the pseudonym of a Russian intelligence officer suspected of being responsible for hacking emails from Podesta. But later, Stone described these communications as "completely harmless".

In the final filings, Stone's team stated that his charges should be dismissed because no one had testified before a grand jury that his statements in question were essential to the House Committee's inquiry into the interference of Russia. Therefore, they can not be accused of lying or obstructing the investigation conducted by Russia. Instead, they say the Democrats in the House have violated the rules of the committee by drawing attention to the fact that he lied.

In fact, according to his legal team, since Congress never complained about Stone's alleged lie at the special council office, Mueller's team does not have the power to investigate without violating the separation of powers.

Moreover, explains Stone, how can he be accused of obstructing the investigation into the Russian interference in electoral matters, if the office of the special council was unable to prove that Americans had taken part in the election? electoral interference? In fact, argues the council, the special council simply punishes Stone for supporting President Donald J. Trump.

In addition, Stone claims that the Department of Justice is not allowed to investigate a sitting president or his campaign. Such an investigation into a president or a presidential campaign is a violation of the US Constitution, the document argues.

"If the Justice Department of the executive branch can not investigate the president and the executive, then Roger Stone's investigation, a direct result of this poisoned tree, must fall," says the motion to dismiss.

The petition also includes as evidence the infamous memorandum of Attorney General William Barr that he sent to the Ministry of Justice last year as a private citizen, criticizing Trump's special lawyer's investigation into a possible hinders justice. It is unclear exactly what relationship Stone's lawyers are trying to establish here.

[ad_2]

Source link