[ad_1]
" Such a document, referred to as "preliminary notice", should not have been made public because it assumes that it must be changed I do not know the procedures for reach the preliminary notice, but the first remark I want to do it on the bottom (that is to say no) this document is a document that, legally, seems to me extremely thin, c & # 39; is a political document, it is a political opinion expressed by the Venice Commission. "The Venice Commission had to analyze the legal issues, not the political options," said Calin Popescu Tariceanu to RTV, according to Mediafax [19659003HegaveasanexamplethereferenceoftheVenetianCommission"TheCommissionofVenicetreatsthesethingswithsuperficialitythatscaresme"
It really scares me. As for the political options we have in the field of criminal policy, in the field of the organization of justice, I think that the filters that we have and that have worked, including the Constitutional Court, were sufficient " , said Tariceanu
The Venice Commission on Friday presented its preliminary opinion on the draft amendments to three Romanian laws in the field of justice, following the petitions of the President of Romania's evaluation and the Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Venice Commission approved the transmission of the assessment of the Romanian authorities, and the Venice Commission should approve this opinion without amendment at the plenary session of October
According to the report, the Venice Commission makes the following recommendations addressed to the Romanian authorities:
– "to re-express postponement of the nomina of the Principal Prosecutors, including by revising the relevant provisions of the Constitution, to provide the conditions for a neutral and objective appointment / dismissal process while preserving the role of institutions such as the country's President and the President. Supreme Council of the Judiciary), able to balance the influence of the Minister of Justice "
-" to eliminate or better define the provisions allowing senior prosecutors to invalidate the solutions of the attorneys for unfit situations "
-" to remove restrictions on the freedom of expression of judges and prosecutors "
[ad_2]
Source link
