[ad_1]
<img class = "td-post-image-full-and-grid aligncenter wp-image-351320" title = "Google Comisia Europeana GRESESTE AMENDA RECORD 351317" src = "https://cdn.idevice.ro/ wp-content / uploads / 2018/07 / Google-Comisia-Europeana-GRESESTE-AMENDA-RECORD-351317.jpg "alt =" Google has today filed a record fine by the European Commission for violating the competition law, with US $ 4.3 billion required by the US company Google has been convicted by European authorities for violating the freedom of Android manufacturers to choose which services to standardize in the phones, but Google says that the reality is very different
Here is the full press release offered today by Google to explain that Android does not violate the competition law in the European Union, and that the fine is applied incorrectly.Google will certainly attack the fine has nnounced by the European Commission, but if it loses, she will have to pay the amount of money, and she will have to make major changes to the Android operating system used by so many people
<img class = " aligncenter wp-image-351319 "title =" Google Comisia Europeana GRESESTE AMENDA RECORD 351317 1 "src =" https://cdn.idevice.ro/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Google-Comisia-Europeana-GRESESTE- AMENDA-RECORD-351317-1.png "alt =" "Android has created more options, the two most popular mobile platforms in the world – one that has helped expand the range of phones available worldwide
Today, the European Commission has taken the decision to initiate anti-competitive practices against Android and its business model. The decision ignores the fact that phones with the Android operating system are competing with iOS phones, a confirmed 89% of market participants made by the Commission. Also overlooks the fact that Android offers countless choices to thousands of mobile phone manufacturers and network operators that produce and sell Android devices; millions of app developers around the world who have built their business with Android and billions of consumers who now allow and use the latest Android smartphones
Today , thanks to Android, there are more than 24,000 devices, at various prices, among more than 1,300 different brands, including Finnish, French, German, Italian, Latvian, Dutch, Polish, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish telephone manufacturers and Hungarian. Android gives you the choice
The phones produced by these companies are different but have something in common: the ability to run the same applications. And this is possible thanks to simple rules that guarantee technical compatibility, regardless of the size or shape of the device. No phone maker is required to adopt these rules – they can use or modify Android as they wish, as Amazon has done with fire pads and TV sticks [19659002] If they want to be successful, open-source platforms need to make special efforts to also meet the needs of each user. History shows that the lack of basic compatibility rules leads to the fragmentation of open-source platforms, which affects users, developers, and phone manufacturers. The Android compatibility rules do not allow it and make it an attractive long-term proposition for everyone.
Creates Flexibility, Options, and Opportunities [19659003] Today, thanks to the Android operating system, a regular phone can have up to one year. to 40 applications from multiple developers, not just from where you buy your phone. If you have other application preferences – or browsers or search engines – that pre-installed, you can easily uninstall them or delete them, and you can opt for other applications, including those created by approximately 1.6 million Europeans
Basically, a regular Android phone user will install about 50 apps. Worldwide, more than 94 billion apps from our Google Play app store were downloaded last year; browsers such as Opera Mini and Firefox have been downloaded more than 100 million times, the UC browser over 500 million times.
This is a considerable difference from the 1990s and early 2000s, in the era of dialup access. From here to here, changing pre-installed applications to the computer or adding new ones was technically cumbersome and took a lot of time. The Commission 's Android decision ignores the new range of options and the obvious evidence of how people are using their phones.
A platform built for the smartphone era [19659003] In 2007 we chose to offer free Android to phone manufacturers and network operators mobile. Of course, the implementation of the Android operating system has cost, and over the last ten years, Google has invested billions of dollars to access the current Android version. The investment is justified because we can offer mobile phone manufacturers the ability to pre-install popular Google applications (such as Search, Chrome, Play, Maps and Gmail), some of which generate revenue for us and guarantee the immediate activation of the phone. directly from the box. Phonemakers are not required to include our services and are free to pre-install competing applications with ours. Which means we only get revenue if our apps are installed and people choose to use them instead of competing apps.
Benefit for the partners, ideal for consumers
Free distribution of the Android platform and the suite of Google apps is effective not only for phone manufacturers and operators, but also for developers and consumers. If phone manufacturers and mobile network operators could not include our apps on their wide range of devices, the balance of the Android ecosystem would have been affected. Until now, the Android business model has allowed us to not even have to ask the phone manufacturers to pay for the technology we offered them, nor to depend on a strictly controlled distribution model. .
I have always considered that enlargement entailed more responsibilities. A healthy and prosperous Android ecosystem is in the interest of all and we have shown that we are ready to make changes. But we are concerned that today 's decision cancels the strong balance we have with Android and sends a worrying signal in favor of patented systems at the expense of open platforms.
Rapid innovation, multiple options and lower prices are classic features of robust competition and Android has made it all easier. Today 's decision rejects the Android business model, which has created more options for everyone, has not limited them. We intend to challenge this decision. "
Source link
