[ad_1]
Eugen Nicolicea, one of Liviu Dragnea's lieutenants in the open war on justice, proposes a PSD interpretation of the preliminary report on the laws of justice of the Venice Commission
The Chairman of the Legal Committee of the House of Representatives MEPs consider that this preliminary opinion "throws a slap in the face" of those of the opposition and the president who said that the laws of justice should not be changed.
Nicolicea states that the preliminary opinion of the Venice Commission contradicts a report of the same forum
. The Chamber of Deputies, PSD MP Eugen Nicolicea, said Friday that the preliminary opinion of the Venice Commission on amending the laws of justice is a draft and contradicts a report of this forum on European standards on the Independence of the judiciary
. in Venice, they give a slap to the eyes of the opposition and the President of Romania, because they have repeatedly asked to change anything to delay and made all kinds of complaints, the Court will take effect , to delay, to freeze. The Venice Commission, you will notice that this requires changes, and those who say nothing are contradicted by it, "said Nicolicea to Agerpres.
The Social Democrats showed that,
" The report on European standards for the independence of the judiciary, adopted by the Venice Commission, is currently in force, an official document, not a draft, that you have now. The document that it presents now is a project that can not beat what they voted last time unless they modify this report. Regarding respect for the independence of judges and prosecutors, in the draft law and in the adopted law, you know that there is a difference between what has been proposed and what has been adopted, it exactly meets these European standards. Those who do not respect are those of the Venice Commission, knowing that in their report, it is said that there are a multitude of models, that we can not recommend a certain model and that in in most cases, senior prosecutors appointed by the government or by Parliament. No mention of the word "president" in the adopted report. And let me tell you why. There is no president in many countries of Europe. If he makes a recommendation in this sense, he must change his own report, "said Nicolicea.
He added that the law had not been changed in the appointment of senior prosecutors, it is remained as before, and the president has a role to play in this regard. "
" Also, if that is the problem, you should refer the following question – the dismissal of the Attorney General of DNA was made on the old law, not on the legislative proposal. "The dissatisfaction is against the old law," he said.
Asked what would be the same? explanation that the two reports of the Venice Commission are different, Nicolicea replied: "We should make an official address, we ask what is the valid report. "
" I would not want to suspect anyone of manipulation and bad faith, but do not read your own documents seems a little helpless to me, not to say "
The Venice Commission recommended Friday to reconsider the appointment and dismissal of senior prosecutors, including by reviewing the respective provisions of the Constitution, in order to create the conditions for a neutral and objective appointment and dismissal process by maintaining the role of such institutions; that the President and the Superior Council of Magistracy (CSM), able to balance the influence of the Minister of Justice
This recommendation is part of the preliminary opinion issued Friday by the Commission of the Venice Advisory Council of the Council of Europe, composed of independent experts in the field of constitutional law) on the draft amendments to three projects amending the laws of justice in Romania manie
[ad_2]
Source link
