Resistance of the civic group attacks the CCR: the mandate of a judge would have expired

"Article 68 (3) of Law 47/1992 allowed a judge of the RAC to exceed the term of nine years, (19659003) http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis / 198614

By decision 136/2018, the CCR determined that this was not the case

http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/200293

Last Thursday, by law 168/2018, the law was promulgated on July 15.

http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/202606

VeDemJust argues that at the moment the one of the judges of the CCR has a mandate that exceeds the constitutional norm ", indicates a message published on Facebook.

Protesters # Resisting the Constitutional Court review for disciplinary reasons the head of the institution, Valer Dorneanu, for the presidency of Lăzăroiu

Adrian Albu and Marian Răduvă on behalf of Realitatea TV

"We reproach him for failing to comply with a decision of the Court he presides in. Two months ago, he had a decision that he had to put into practice and he did not. has not done so, and according to the JRC rules, he must be held responsible. "[Et19659003]" Valer Dorneanu made a very serious mistake and he did not take into account a JRC decision , he formulated his own opinion on behalf of the Court, which was wrong and did not inform the institution which was to take note of the end of Mr Lazaroiu's term on the grounds that the mandate of the dance we exceeded years "