[ad_1]
Shortly after, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., S, opposed the GOP consensus claiming that President Trump had "committed unstoppable behavior" in the form of an obstruction of justice, while that another known critic of Trump had taken a reverse position.
Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah, acknowledged that, although he had called Trump when he thought it appropriate, he did not believe that the Mueller Report provided any evidence to support the case. an impeachment of the president.
AS CHILDREN AFFECTED CHINA THREAT, ROMNEY HAS A NEW WARNING
"I do not think there is any element you would need to prove a case of obstruction of justice," said Romney at the same time. Animator Jake Tapper on the CNN Union State Sunday, while acknowledging that "everyone draws his own conclusion". "
Nevertheless, Romney said that he "was troubled by this", but did not think that the allegations set out in the report were sufficient to reach the level of a charge of obstruction.
Romney specifically pointed to the element of intent, which is required in the context of an obstruction charge. He said the absence of an underlying crime, like any conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, makes it difficult to demonstrate that Trump's actions were based on a corrupt intent that hid something.
"You simply do not have the elements," Romney said.
POST-MUELLER REPORT, JOURNALISTS RESPOND TO THE TREATMENT OF THE 2012 RUSSIAN PREDICTION OF ROMNEY
Amash advanced the opposite theory in a Saturday thread on Twitter, claiming that he had read the report and that "President Trump had engaged in impenetrable conduct". Romney said that he "respected" Amash, he disagrees with his conclusion.
[ad_2]
Source link