Rush Limbaugh: The Democratic Media lied about Trump for three years; they can not now impose dismissal | Video



[ad_1]

Union radio host Rush Limbaugh explains how Democrats and left-wing media such as MSNBC, CNN and the New York Times are no longer able to deliver on the promise that President Trump would be removed from office or revoked.

I mean, their audience was interested in that, and what I mean is that the people who run this impeachment procedure are left-wing voters who have been submitting to all these media for more than two years. They were told daily, "Trump was hearing". Every day they were told, "Trump was a cheater." They were told every day that Trump had worked with Putin, that Trump had stolen the election. "Hillary was the legitimate winner! Trump was not. Every day they were told that Trump was being deceived, every day that he was the worst of the reprobates of all time.

They believed it – and can you blame them? I mean, their media has assured them of that. Now they went there believing it. I mean, they did not need the media, but the media was a reinforcement. It is one of the things that always surprises me. The media that lied and misled the entire audience did not apologize, ask for forgiveness, or even explain it. They simply go to the next phony hoax, taking with them what is left of their hearing.

But these people are at first unbalanced. They are liberals. They are not securely assembled. In any case, they are not mentally adjusted – and then you lie to them every day and you build their hopes that what they want most in the world, Trump in prison, is only a matter of time. And, my friends, I do not know how many of you have taken the time to look at all this. I did it. From the New York Times to the Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC, they did everything, but promised that Trump was guilty.

They did everything, but promised to have the proofs! They lied to their audience! They assured them that the proof was there and that it was only a matter of time before it was produced. There were credible "experts" from former Obama administration officials to former FBI members. They were everywhere. They were quoted in the New York Times. The New York Times! "The official document." You can not blame these people for believing, and they did.

At one point, they still think it's true, that someone just missed it. They think everyone – Mueller, the FBI, whatever – it ruined everything! That's why they want the impeachment to continue because they know it's there! They were told that it was there. And the media they watched and read did not tell them that they were wrong. CNN did not say that they were wrong about anything. The New York Times did not say it was wrong.

The Washington Post did not say it was wrong. They continue to report on Trump as if he were guilty of everything they accused him of starting even before the election. Their media continues to lie to them, to mislead them. But now, I told you. I told you at the end of last week and at the beginning of this week that it is starting to wreak havoc, that I do not care about the confusion that exists between these people, it even happened that they stop doing trust these people and stop listening. for them.

Especially if there are no excuses, there is no acknowledgment that we are mistaken. If they continue to hit it, people can not cling to it with so much passion and energy. It's just going downhill. It will disappear. Mistrust of the media is growing in the media, and I think that's reflected in those numbers. "MSNBC and CNN lost nearly one-third of their respective audiences in prime time compared to the same period last year." It was the same thing three months ago.

It's a steady decline so far, for CNN and MSNBC. Well, CNN has never had a lot of audience outside airports. They would reach one million. MSNBC, at one point, had four or five million. They are now barely over a million. They lost about 80%. It's a continuous slide. What deserves to be highlighted is the ranking of these outlets and sales of prints and subscriptions of the New York Times, the Washington Post and all that …

They were a little defeated after Trump's victory. I mean, it was Panic City, and the media was reputable. They went dirty every day, making sure Trump went there, making sure Trump would be found guilty, making sure Trump would lose his job. All these people wearing their vagina hats gathered wherever they could to follow their daily therapy sessions. They would go to Pravda, to MSNBC, and it became what it became! The fools on the left looked at the media as their therapists!

Do you remember the loss of John Kerry in 2004, and some therapists who opened a boutique here in South Florida that helped the Democrats cope with the shock? Well, imagine that nationally and imagine that MSNBC, CNN and the New York Times are becoming therapists for these people. So you have a hysterical story, and she was filled with hysteria! "Trump did the bullshit! Trump is an agent! Trump is a traitor! Trump sold America! Hillary should have won! "Add it all in. It's hysteria – and the hysterical story after it has collapsed.

At the same time, Donald Trump flourishes in his duties. Donald Trump cuts taxes. Donald Trump initiates the reform of immigration. Donald Trump begins to build the wall. Donald Trump gets a travel ban. Trump continues to move forward! Trump starts talking to Kim Jong-un. Trump is in the trade war with ChiComs to balance the ground. So, while these people are listening to the media every day to know that Trump will soon be in jail, in reality, Trump is in full swing. He tweeted and mocked them.

He makes fun of them – he makes fun of their faces – and they end up being fooled. It has been three years since these people, the Democratic base, lie, without excuses, without mea culpa, without "forgive us", without any recognition that they have been lied to. The same people who told them that he was 90% sure that Hillary would win in a landslide! The same people who published the polls that showed that Hillary was going to win in a landslide.

The same people who told them that after Trump's victory, he would be removed from office, that he would be removed from office. The media always lie to them. Are they finally realizing it? I think they are. They abandon MSNBC en masse. They abandon CNN en masse. We know the New York Times will be the last to disappear because it is the official newspaper.

I do not think the Times can do anything to ruin its credibility with these people, but others, I think that makes sense. To answer the question "Why is he dismissed?" Those people who bought everything, the media assure him, now demand that someone do it, that someone gets rid of that guy. And it's up to Jerry Nadler, Jerry Nadler of the Judiciary Committee of the House.

But here is a story from the PA, ladies and gentlemen. "Some Democrats involved in the judiciary establish rules of impeachment." This is a classic example of history that requires me to interpret it for you. 'Because it's in the weeds. It's deliberately in weeds. This story is meant to reveal the facts, but in a general way, most people will not understand. The AP can say that they did their job.

Let me spell this story. The mainstream media claim, and their legal experts claim, not to understand why Nadler does this. They do not know why, they are trying to tell us that they do not know why Nadler is holding his official impeachment hearings, because that makes no sense. It makes no sense to ask for a vote on this. That makes no sense to the MPs who won the Trump Districts in 2018, it makes no sense to save them here, and yet, Nadler is going from there. before.

And so this story tries to say that the media themselves and their legal experts do not understand why Nadler does it, and it's a joke because they support the fact that Nadler does it. They just do not want to admit that they support it either. The truth is that Nadler is proceeding and Pelosi lets him proceed in the hope – and that's all they have – in the hope that this bogus impeachment investigation will deceive a Obama or Clinton judge forcing Trump to hand over documents. like his tax returns protected by the separation of powers and the privilege of the executive power.

They have nothing. They never had anything. Trump did nothing unpredictable, never once. Mueller's request was to set up an impeachment, and Mueller did not find anything! There is nothing! They are convinced that Trump has nevertheless done it. They need his documents. This is the phase in which we find ourselves now. And despite the media and some of these so-called moderate democrats, there are none.

There are no more moderate democrats. I do not care what the media talks about, refers to them as such, they do not exist. This story tells how much people fear that Nadler will go down that path when they secretly wish. Under the Constitution and case law, a president can only be compelled to surrender these documents if he is the subject of an official investigation for the purpose of dismissal.

If there is an official investigation of indictment, the separation of powers becomes a little blurry. And then it is possible for a deranged Obama judge to come in and give Nadler's committee access, for example, to Trump's tax returns. And that's what Nadler and Pelosi are doing now, and they are doing it only because they have to keep their base for the 2020 elections and their base is losing their minds.

Again, sorry to be repetitive. Their base was lied for two and a half years. Their base has been assured that Trump did it, that Trump is guilty. All the people they trust told them, from the media to the elect, so, by God, they want to go do it. They want them to find the evidence and get rid of the guy. Democrats must pretend to do it, even if they know there is nothing here. They will not receive Trump's tax returns.

Nancy Pelosi, Nadler hopes that some judges will come forward and give them access, while they continue to complain that Trump must be dismissed, must be removed from office. And if a judge supports it, then Pelosi will announce the start of a true impeachment procedure. But not before. "Because there is no way to go to trial and there is never a conviction, so it will be just an exercise for the show.

Let's go to the sound sounds. This is Jerry Nadler, this morning, at the hearing before the Capitol Hill House Judiciary Committee which is considering a resolution on the impeachment hearing procedure.

NADLER: This committee is conducting an investigation that will allow us to determine when it is recommended to recommend an indictment of President Trump. That's what we do. Some call this process an investigation of impeachment. Some call this an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer worry about discussing the nomenclature. But let me clear up any doubt that remains. Conduct under investigation is a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat and we do it.

RUSH: They can not name anything, but Trump's conduct is a threat to our democracy. This is Doug Collins, who is the Republican in the committee standings.

COLLINS: We are so in the fantasy world that nobody knows what's going on. That's the problem. You just returned to what we said. Instagram, snapshot, Twitter, whatever. We are not in an indictment investigation!

RUSH: And we are not part of it because there is no vote yet! Nadler says it's only a matter of calming the fools on the left, but there is no official account yet, and it will not be unless renegade judges open the way for them to get the statements. Trump's income or something.

TRANSCRIPTION BREAK

RUSH: Take the number 13 sound, Tom McClintock. It's another Republican who reacts to Jerry Nadler's announcement that an "official" investigation is underway. He does not care what you call, they do it, and here … Doug Collins reacted by saying (impression): "It's a fantastic world. There is nothing official that happens here. You are just trying to soothe Twitter. You try to calm Instagram, Face Chat, InstantChat, whatever, Mr. President, but we know you have nothing to do! It was Doug Collins – a pretty good impersonation – and then, Tom McClintock, with his catch.

MCCLINTOCK: That's all you have to do! Resolve that the House authorize the Judiciary Committee to conduct an inquiry into the dismissal of the Speaker. It's so simple. I challenge you to do it. In fact, I double-dog you dare to do it. Ask the House to vote on those 18 words and then move on.

RUSH: Okay. Well, here is the sound 14. It is at the committee hearing that examines the resolution on indictment proceedings. That's after the vote, President, Jerrold Nadler …

NADLER: The clerk will call!

GREFFIER: Mr. Chairman, there are 24 yes and no.

NADLER: You have it. The resolution is accepted. This concludes our work for today.

RUSH: Okay. So, they are running. Pelosi really does not want that to happen; she could not stop him. So it must feel like you're on board – and I'm telling you, it's the inmates who run the asylum. It's the Democratic base that forces it. In addition, Nadler was awarded in the same way as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of Alexandria, and he must try to protect his flank, and that's all.

TRANSCRIPTION BREAK

RUSH: Now, I want to go back to the impeachment procedure for a moment, because I had some Pelosi sound notes, and I want to repeat something about it. If you did this yourself, if you checked the news – if you paid attention to it – you know that the whole procedure that Nadler was forced to do, calling for a vote and having an official investigation or investigation … He does not want to discuss the nomenclature. The fact is that everyone calls it a circus. Everyone calls it a joke. He has no purpose. This is not a goal. This does not seem to be organized. The main objective is not to appease a group of ill-intentioned voters.

And again, I told you last week that the reason Pelosi did not want to vote was because of all the Democrats who won in 2018 in the Trump districts. You know, she does not care if Nadler is interested in dismissal. If there is a vote, it puts people on the record – and there is no poll in the United States that shows almost all the people who want Trump removed. So the Democrats have nothing to do with this except for fundraising and to calm their base.

Pelosi has lost control of the situation and you will see references to these "moderate Democrats from Trump Districts who want or do not want to …". There are no moderate democrats. It's just a bad direction of the media and an obfuscation. There are no moderate democrats. I mean, they're trying to pretend that, you know, Biden is a moderate. Biden does not know what he is anymore! Biden says what he has to say to give the impression of being on the same page as all these radicals, but he does not know what he is. By the way, these people have a debate tonight, is not it, Mr. Snerdley? (interrupt) That's right. It's in Houston.

The Democrats have a debate and I think Fauxcahontas is at the center of the discussion because it is really going to attack Plugs. Kamala Harris is going to take on everyone because the bottom of her campaign has collapsed. So here is Pelosi. We have some sound clips starting at number 22. It was just this morning. She had her weekly press point. And the reporter said, "Look, Madam President, on the other topic of the day, the impeachment, do you recognize that the impeachment investigation of President Trump is ongoing?

[ad_2]

Source link